Member Info for persimmon

I believe this country the UK has a better future totally away from the undemocratic and unelected Empire builders who reside in Brussels. Like all Empires it will have a shelf life; when the majority of the populations its supposed to represent find out what the construct is really all about it will fall. I bought my wife a car manufactured in the UK last year (made by British workers) and not the previous German models. I have recently told my wine advisor not to offer me any more French wines. There I have got that off my chest, and I will mention politics no more.

krull, why do you ask?

ivans...that is utter rubbish, whilst the pound and some stocks may suffer for a short while, RBD will be unaffected. in fact If anything Brexit with no deal will be a plus for this company, as we will not have to rely on energy being transmitted from unhelpful countries like France.

Now now Rubey, just because we're building up a cosy relationship. Let's keep it to ourselves otherwise BlackHopper will be getting jealous.

Rubey, now I am getting very concerned as I concur with you not once but twice more. Any substantive deal on a sale will be years away and there WILL be more raises along the way with dilution for share holders. That is a fact.

B.H and Rubey, what is going on? for once I agree with you, it was a sell.

1.5p before B.H corrects me

Wilson83, whilst I hope you are correct with your forecast I think there is not a 'cat in hells chance' of the s.p achieving 1.2-1.3p before 2021. In fact I would be very surprised if that figure was achieved prior to the Well testing completion and accompanying RNS later in January.

What were the positives and negatives of the Presentation? My view of proceedings.
Lets get out the negativity first.
I was disappointed that it was primarily a P.R operation skewed towards prospective clients and not shareholders. Of the 55 minute podcast around 40 minutes was a sales pitch outlining what we as shareholders already knew. The introduction of live discussion was obviously stage managed probably with only pre submitted questions chosen. I would be interested to hear from anyone who wished to ask a question 'live'.
Now for the positive 15 minutes of discussion.
Taking into account the constraints of the company being unable to divulge any really meaningful insight without an RNS, I found as a previous blogger questions about the company appearing on NADAQ promising. I will look forward to seeing whether this actually occurs before the next podcast. And if not why not!
Also a very good move in my opinion, is to bring in a third party to oversee the leasing of our products. Money up front and repeat clients, and a small cost....what's not to like?
Projected acceptance from TAS following ongoing tests regarding screening at airports. Once accepted I can see this being rolled out across the world.
Very low payback 6-12 months for employee screening at large distribution hubs. Surely this is a 'no brainer', as accepted business practice is taking up any capital payback period under 2 years.
Opening of a European office in Holland. Another promising area for growth in the present climate.
Altogether a very good outlook , with Covid-19 and social distancing the 'icing on the cake', although a different route to expansion would have been infinitely preferable.
This company has great potential, that much is obvious with the present share price well under water. Expect exponential growth for the foreseeable future.

deermule........yes I am very pleased. Looking at another of my stocks in more depth before possibly taking the plunge. I have only just glossed over the RBD RNS to date. The s.p movements this am are what are to be expected, the real movements will come after Well Testing and then and only then will prospective buyers take the time to see whether there is any commercial value or not. I suspect the 'acid test' excuse the saying will also be how the oil and gas will flow, and following that becoming apparent, what discount to apply to any offer (if any) if unconventional means are need for extraction.
Long way to go yet, we are still in the very early stages, but a promising beginning.

B.H....I'm not a conspiracy theorist., but if the drill news is to be poor, would the best time to release it be the same day as a No Deal Brexit, should No Deal be the case?

Analysister....I agree with much of your comment apart from the final sentence. I just have a feeling that unlike Brexit which will be determined one way or the other over the next 30 days, this may will take many more weeks before a real outcome is known. Hope I'm wrong.

All sorts of late inclusions involving Delayed trades, Systematic Internaliser SINT negotiated / counterparty dealings. It could point to a leak of some description appearing. But who really knows. The word transparency has not yet filtered down to AIM.

It was cancelled and then amended to the correct price of 0.45p

Yep, it means I've gone for the 'big stick' on a long Par 3.

You need Imagination (and a bit of research), AND remember this is AIM, where all that glitters is not gold.....or iron pyrite!

Unimaginative.......Most likely a swap arranged days ago!

The large trade 39M is non price forming, so ignore it. It has to be published however under market rules. MM's may use it of course to trap unwary investors.

Why?

Many punters on here believe the West Newton drills will be either a roaring success or a duster. If the former then 1-2p, if the latter the 0.2p. But what if the RNS states that the results so far, regarding commerciality are inconclusive. Myself I think that this will be a more likely outcome for a number of reasons. If this proves to be the case, and myself having 'skin in the game' (yes B.H and Rubey I do have, and not a 'tree hugger as suggested) hope it's very successful.

But if not what are the likely scenarios?
1) Will the drill if inconclusive be announced in the same vein á la the Colter drill and proceed with further W.N drills?
2) Will the directors try to bring W.N to commercialisation by bringing through W.N planning consents themselves?
3) Will another placing to fund new projects amongst other spending run in parallel with the either of the above?