George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
Not addressing the salient point then? Quelle surprise.
per ardua ad astra
Are you two a double act?
No credibility can be found in labelling respondees ostriches when the sales agreement conversation was started by by someone criticising them. Sheesh... I hope for your sake your attention is better focused when it comes to your own investments. Or is this how it works now, so fixated on criticism of others, you’re now even criticising the very act of responding.
Lamentable.
per ardua ad astra
“ Might be a suggestion to flood the comments section of Ms Washtell’s article on the This is Money website with your thoughts in respect of het journalism”
——-
No probably not. Apart from the reasoned, informative and considered contributions probably being lost among a tide of berating and recrimination, there’s every chance those sounding bitter, clawing, or desperate are hardly likely to reflect well upon Sirius and their investor base. Particularly so if you consider that the average Daily Mail reader is more than likely to rush to a judgement. I don’t think they do nuance.
per ardua ad astra
You ever thought of a career on the stage, KOH?
You do play ‘poisonous little *****’ ever so well.
per ardua ad astra
“The seed of delisting has been sown and will gnaw away at the shares for the coming days and weeks.”
——-
With not a little help from you scattering it far and wide within 15 minutes of the article’s publication eh, skier?
Glad I had better things to do at 22:00 on a Friday night.
per ardua ad astra
“ We live in a society that rewards non workers with a house enormous benefits to breed large familes who continue the cycle.”
——-
No. We live in a civilised society that cares for its most vulnerable. Thank goodness. That some people choose to exploit such compassion, should reflect upon them as individuals and not society at large.
And this country is not **** as you rather inelegantly and unfairly put it. Even with all of its current troubles and recriminations I’m still proud of my country. It’s unfortunate you’re not.
per ardua ad astra
No probs, chriso. When it comes to acquiring knowledge and a greater appreciation for some of the more systemic, procedural or regulatory aspects of this game, b.b.’s can provide us all with a valuable resource which, even it leads to further enquiries or research, can help us all navigate some of the unfamiliar practices or procedures. Invariably it is where facts start blending with opinion we find ourselves coming unstuck and the value diminishes imo. As such, don’t feel reticent to ask any questions when you are unsure or looking to cement any understanding. Anyone who takes the mick or, looks to score points will inevitably always be lacking in some respect themselves.
Regards,
per ardua ad astra
We were all ‘green’ once, and anyone
Nobody ‘bothered’, chriso. It was an ‘A’ trade executed automatically as part of a larger order.
The same will generally applies whether it is the mythical ‘1’ share, 7 shares or 137 shares. Invariably ALL trades of such seemingly irrelevant volumes will be automatic, and I’ll bet you dollars for donuts that whenever some numpty highlights the 1 share code myth, they will be drawing attention to an ‘A’ trade, and NEVER an ‘O’ which would involve direct input.
Regards,
per ardua ad astra
“ The product is rubbish...farmers want potassium, not everything else that comes with the polyhalite.”
——-
Yeah... what would those clowns at Yara know about crop nutrition anyway:
http://www.yara.co.uk/crop-nutrition/agronomy-advice/dont-forget-about-sulphur/
Bloody amateurs. Pfft...
per ardua ad astra
If that’s the case it sounds like common sense to me. If you reverse into an empty bay, you can’t reverse out into oncoming traffic, can you?
If it’s by directive rather than coincidence, I commend our H&S officer for being so thorough.
Cheers,
per ardua ad astra
Good morning, Tex. Thanks for observing that of course I got it. Six idiots dangerously far from their village still took the opportunity to agree with a perceived swipe nonetheless. Probably because, anything - accurate or otherwise - is a good thing thing, if it is a dig at me.
Look forward the whimpers of me being ‘patronising’ or ‘condescending’ from the memories of goldfish when, in weeks to come, my disdain for such stupidity manifests. Still, it’s a shame that the author was unable to acknowledge their error and retract it. It would have been the decent thing to do and served them well imho. Ho hum.
Regards,
per ardua ad astra
“It will probably be a bit of a damp squid [sounds fishy!] with CF stating the several avenues for further finance they will be looking at but with no definite answer to the problem.”
—- -
All the more reason not to perpetuate the belief that we are all waiting for ‘The End Of The Month RNS’™? then. No? Particularly when the CEO was only quoted by a newspaper as being “hopeful”
I appreciate there’s been a helluva lot to get our heads around of late, however, managing expectations isn’t generally perceived as a strong suit for the denizens of is board.
This is as Fraser was quoted by The Times: “I’m hopeful that by the end of October we’re in a position where the strategic review will have reached a series of outcomes that we can then start talking about.”
Anticipating/expecting/waiting for something that isn’t definitely coming only serves to open the door to detractors when it is not forthcoming. It’ll get here when it gets here. And hopefully to all our advantage.
per ardua ad astra
Just can’t stay away can you, Professor Chow? Hamming it up as you are is playing havoc with your subject, verb and object sequencing. So much so that you appear to be tripping over yourself as if you were a boozy Suzy. What gives?
per ardua ad astra
“Educated opinion” isn’t typically evinced by compiling a headline that is demonstrably untrue.
I’m not sure who it is you think you are hoodwinking, or why, but, please, don’t flatter, fool or deceive yourself so much, that even you think you are here doing anything other than prosecuting an agenda.
per ardua ad astra
Alan, you wouldn’t know what a Fact!!!* actually is if you were slapped around the chops with Whitby’s finest. All too often your ‘facts’ are little more than opinion and misdirection delivered with the newspaper.
But you just carry on, fella. There’ll be intelligent people reading and chuckling, and who will know without question - and certainly without you telling them - that you ‘take The Mail’.
Of course you do.
per ardua ad astra
“Or is there different laws for the European Bosses !!”
——
No difference in the law for anyone, Alan. Only a significant difference in our powers of comprehension. ‘European Bosses’ - (bogeyman du jour seemingly, though who knows who they are outside your imagination) obviously place significantly greater emphasis on their own industry, than we consistently do ours, Alan. But why are you surprised? This is the prime minister who famously exclaimed “F**K business. And you support him.
No mirrors in your house, huh?
per ardua ad astra
“Abusive langauges, swearing, even insulting people's ethnic backgrounds for having a different opinion on the share.
How is that civil?”
——-
It’s not. Which is why as far as our hosts are concerned it is not tolerated. If such behaviour offends you, then report it. It’s hard to see how engaging in a similarly provocative manner will change things for the better.
Good luck to you, I’ll leave you to it, but, you could turn the other cheek you know — quite satisfied that they might potentially have lost out if that’s what does it for you.
per ardua ad astra
“I'm not trying to help.
Two years later and I'm back.
I like to hear what the rampers had to say after all their abuses and dominance of the bb.”
——-
An eye for an eye, eh? Genius! You’ll go far.
per ardua ad astra
“Many private landlords (a lot of them bad or slum landlords) had it peachy for years paying little or no taxes...”
——-
You belie your chosen name when you rush to such a broad-brush approach. The situation you highlight is a matter of enforcement and not legislation. I don’t seek to evade any taxes at all. Not least because I recognise that is the price of a fair and civilised society, however, if the taxes of those that do pay cannot be partially used to ensure payment by those who seek to evade doing so, and instead the authorities simply charge those who do pay even more well, that’s hardly fair is it? How might you receive the proposal that all share purchases are now subject to 5% stamp to offset some hedge funds channeling money offshore and out of reach of the exchequer? Not too enthusiastically, I should imagine.
Binary thinking is what has led this country into its current travails.
per ardua ad astra
“As I said earlier it would be political suicide to wipe out the shareholders in this project.”
———
Would that it were. Unfortunately for us there are certain sections of society that, for one reason or other, and to some extent understandably, do not instantly command the sympathies of the wider public. Investors/speculators/gamblers* fall into such a group. For example, George Osborne’s simple and cynical raid on private landlords, doesn’t appear to have done the Tories any lasting harm, has it?
In light of the manner with which the incumbent prime minister appears quite content to trash the customs, conventions and practices that we have hitherto considered the norm, I’d be wary of placing too much faith in him ‘doing the right thing’ anyway. Besides, doesn’t it all depend on the prism through which we observe things? When set against the perception (accurate or otherwise) that Labour policy might prove disadvantageous to private investors, Johnson’s ‘B’ Team are perhaps more than aware that they have a reasonable amount of wriggle room within which they might indulge their levities.
More pity us.
per ardua ad astra