Member Info for parkez

Hello! Great question. No, 35,000 microfarads (μF) is not the same as 35 millifarads (mF).

Here's the breakdown:

1 millifarad (mF) = 1,000 microfarads (μF)

So, 35 mF = 35,000 μF

Therefore, 35,000 μF is equal to 35 mF.

If you're asking whether 35,000 μF equals 35 mF, then yes, they are the same!

And maybe new partners....nanoCaps?

It's described as the NEW DMH...

So something different...

Cap-xx state they have a new binder coating line, it's going into something....SMT yes, DMH...I think so.

AI Overview

+1

Yes, 35000 uF is the same as 35 mF. The "uF" and "mF" are both abbreviations for microfarads, a unit of capacitance, according to Anypcba. The "m" in "mF" represents "micro", just like the "u" in "uF". Therefore, 35000 uF and 35 mF both represent a capacitance of 35 millionth of a farad.

Audio Circuits

In audio equipment, mF capacitors are used to filter out unwanted frequencies and control signal coupling between stages. Their ability to block DC current while allowing AC signal through is essential for clear and accurate audio reproduction.

Filtering Circuits

Capacitors, including those rated in mF, are integral to filtering circuits. These circuits remove noise and unwanted signals from electrical signals by taking advantage of the capacitive reactance properties of the capacitors, allowing to pass high-frequency or low-frequency currents as needed.

The farad (F) is the base unit of capacitance in the International System of Units (SI), but it represents an impractically large amount of capacitance for most electronic applications. Consequently, the microfarad (mF), which is one millionth of a farad (10^-6 F), is far more commonly used. This is because practical electronic circuits typically require capacitances in the range of microfarads, nanofarads, or even picofarads

If there's a leak...my guess it's NOT headphone related.

Bigger fish than that coming.

Anyone thought it might already be at 1p when the multinational conglomerate news is given.

That news could be but a drop in the ocean of potential news coming soon.

Lars said about upgrading the website..

" we must not get ahead of ourselves ".

The website is here...

Suggests all systems go now.

For whom?

All manufacturers using electrodes with graphene or activated carbon can change to electrodes made by nanoCaps. The result is significantly higher energy and power density. The foil is made on rolls that will fit directly into existing machinery without changes. Customers can use their own brand and “Powered by nanoCaps”.

Seems they are going to licence the tech.

Question is are we licensing or a JV?

Not sure myself Vanilla.

Lars makes a visit to an electrode manufacturer...collaboration is mentioned.

We have a new electrode slurry.....must be something in it?

Sorry...they do supercaps as well....

NanoCaps make electrodes for supercapacitors, not supercapacitors...maybe a JV.

Vanilla,

All i have is what ive posted...

i would say nanoCaps are the first customer for the binder.

as usual we are guessing off a few remarks.....

important part they are planning on commercialising it!

I posted a link yesterday regarding nanoCaps.

"Wednesday 7th. of November, the CEO of the Australian company CAP-XX, Lars Stegmann, paid us a visit. CAP-XX is one of the leading companies making supercapacitors. They have a wide range of supercapacitors in their portfolio.

The purpose of the visit was to show the roll-to-roll production of electrodes and to discuss further development, collaboration, and go-to-market opportunities for nanoCaps."

From Lars on Linkedin

Step by step...

Today we finalized our next steps in cooperation with nanoCaps in Norway.

First customer, first project and first agreement could closed successfully.

Now,we need to think out of the box and scale up!

Together, we can!

Also attached 4 photos, the interesting 1 was of the DMH supercap that i am surmising has just been developed with the new binder and appears to increase power by circa 80%.

This is just by coating the electrode with a new slurry.

Here we have an electrode manufacturer becoming a customer....you would guess it involves the new binder.

AND they comment on scaling up.....Seems the new binder is going to be commercialised in some form!

AI Overview

A "design win" in business refers to a manufacturer's product being selected by an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to be incorporated into a new product or model. This signifies that the component will be included in the final product's design and bill of materials, leading to a potential for recurring sales over the product's production life.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

Supplier Selection:

A design win occurs when a supplier's product is chosen for integration into an OEM's product design.

Component Integration:

This means the supplier's component (e.g., microprocessor, microcontroller, sensor) is included in the OEM's bill of materials.

Potential for Recurring Revenue:

Once a design win is achieved, the supplier anticipates receiving recurring sales from the OEM as the product is manufactured and sold.

Long-Term Sales Cycle:

Vehicle development cycles can be lengthy, so revenue from a design win might not be realized immediately, but it is typically secured once mass production begins.

Symbol of Quality and Prestige:

Design wins on high-value products often indicate a component manufacturer's good quality and engineering capabilities.

Vanilla,

How do you know the design wins have not resulted in revenue?

Where does the revenue come from if its not design wins?

Not being argumentative...just curious.

I think they have developed products which have not set the market alight...

But my understanding is a design win is the cap-xx product being selected and therefore a order is made,

IF the product comes to market.

Take the recent multinational conglomerate design win. Every chance it's only 100, 000 products to be manufactured....how much revenue for Cap-xx?

Would we be aware of such an amount if it was not for it being a high profile customer?

I've been here since the day before the AVX licence agreement...

Not always invested ( luckily) but following news.

Little rusty on some history but confident the future is promising.

Time will tell...but happy to be here until I feel different.

Marine edge propulsion system is still under development.

Orders were made for testing.....

Can't exactly blame Cap-xx for failure...

It's likely to be years of testing yet...imo.

Vanilla.

Marine edge?

According to Lars their is more to come for the new website..

Perhaps the marine edge product will be added later...a new improved version?

Along with smt...

Or as you say it's had its day....or never actually happened.

How would we know?