RE: Revenue Generation30 Sep 2024 09:35
@Elliot
No need to apologise, it's good to have different opinions and perspectives on things - guess that's the beauty of it.
Maybe you are right, maybe not - I am just an enthusiast in this space and have a better knowledge and understanding of the plant / genetic side of things compared to most, especially when viewing it from an investment perspective - most here would have more focus on finances and results etc.
That said, in the USA (market much more advanced), it is possible to patent strains if they have unique features - for example, unusually high levels of myrcene or limonene - as this could have medical benefits. The requirements are strict to meet, but it's there to protect commercial interests.
In a commercial venture, I just cannot see there being no implications by NOT breeding your own genetics. As I say, I very well could be completely wrong, but I do not understand the company's approach to this. To give an example - lets say growing medicinal cannabis in the UK wasn't such a ring-fenced industry it currently is - many companies could grow the exact same strain / genetics, purchased freely on the open market. What do you think is going to happen to the price of Celadon's flower product? It'll collapse in price because there is an excess supply of the same product on the market.
Do the breeding work in-house, keep your genetics tightly owned, even patented in markets which will allow, and no other business entity can produce YOUR product without licensing agreements etc.
The website says "meticulously bred" etc - so why have they not spoken ANYTHING on the subject in any company documents. Surely as a business, you would be getting that information out there, highlighting the work done and the developments made on this "meticulous breeding" - there is none.
Just my small take on that particular angle of the company.