Member Info for oilmanmike

Mogadorians are an endangered and aggressive species of extraterrestrials.

I have one account here and 1 chat on tele. Perhaps I should change my name here for clarity.
Thanks for the heads up

Speak for yourself

1 week ago

LoL I posted that 2 weeks ago!

the point is this is exactly the time you might have expected an acceleration given the 1st hole completed over 2 weeks ago

If you look at Grid Drilling's Facebook page you will see that 10 hours ago they advertised for drillers and Offsiders.
This has to be to crew a second rig as Wayne Gridley has not been drilling before Feb 2021 until he got the CopperHead contract.

Rascal you hold me responsible for what exactly?

You eecme

Strummer very little of note sp wise. But in terms of moving the gold and copper projects during a very difficult time for us all. I am pretty certain DP will deliver the copper just as he did the Gold.
These Copper Porphyry deposits are very large

Anybody up for it. Not like an Ambassador but without the Ferrera Roche

He is not allowed to say lost is copper. The original RNS reads a lot better with the “weak increase in magnetite alteration” explained as a good thing.
I have posted a pic taken on my phone of the email on my laptop so that a member here who is also a member on my chat can verify for those here.
I may allow one member from here to join my chat without proof of ownership so that future verification can be trusted going forward

Dear Mike,
 
Thank you for your email. It is always good to be able to share additional clarification with your group.
 
Geophysical techniques, including magnetic surveys are purely a guide to what may lie beneath the surface. Clearly, they rely on remote sensing to identify any anomalies in the field being tested, as we are unable to accurately say what is there, until we drill. The magnetic survey conducted at Copperhead identified a gradual increase in magnetism at depth. This of course does not translate into "copper" and increased magnetism may be caused by many factors.
 
The principle points in my RNS are:

1) chalcopyrite (copper sulphate) has been intersected
2) chalcopyrite has been intersected over very large intervals
3) at 500m below surface, we are still observing chalcopyrite-bearing veins.
 
It is important to understand that geophysical indicators, weak or otherwise, are simply a useful guide and are never definitive. Copper, particularly in porphyry systems is often associated with alteration of the rock by  magnetite. My RNS informed the market that an increase in alteration magnetite is occurring - this is a good sign.

I trust this explains the position more thoroughly. Please feel free to contact me again for further clarification if required.
 
Kind regards,
David
 
David W Price - CEO
Rockfire Resources plc

Metal of course I can see the difference but my point is the markets did not like the word ‘weak’ specifically and didn’t particularly like Magnetite either. That was clear from the reaction yesterday. I have email confirmation from DP that weak in the context the RNS is a good thing. Now would you like to see the contents of the RNS or are you gonna just keep on insisting your view is correct

Metal weak increase does say weak you are using semantics. As you have no intention joining my group I thought I would share. Do you want to know the reply from DP or do you think you
Know better?

DP has confirmed that weak is good by email BTW but as media cannot be posted here the proof cannot be posted here

Best to arrive at this party early. The market ran a mile when MM shook the tree. All because of a single four letter word contained in the RNS. In this instance ‘weak’ is good as it indicates a transition in alteration type as the hole moves out of the Pyllic alteration zone and into the potassic we’re the bulk of the metal ore is

you lot are a joke

Jones YKN

Barbershop = twunt