Member Info for nockynoo

someones stolen the rabbit

nidgm post a link to the share chart showing nano at 18p
i think you need to visit specsavers.

nigwit between 1st sept and 31st dec 2017 the lowest price was 22.50p on 13th sept 2017.
would you like to correct your previous statement about being offered for 18p?

Nigwit from the RNS dated 4th October 2017

"Scaled-back shares to be offered to institutional investors by way of an accelerated bookbuild (conducted by Peel Hunt), which will open with immediate effect, and to Directors and senior management by way of direct subscription with the Company"

I can't see any reference to being avalable on LSE

Warren it is not point scoring, but attempting to inject reality instead of
the naive perspective certain contributors(or their avatars) on this board.
NIgwit do you think watson was entitled to participate in the 18p placing.
If so at least the rest of the employees, having been employed for a
much longer period should have been granted the the same options.
Also why were the PI's not offered a chance to participate.
As for driving, you get nowhere fast if the gearbox does n't have any
forward gears.

If i could yes, but unfortunately whenever I try to get in
its full of dishevelled destitute nanoco shareholders fighting
each other for the bargains.

If i could yes, but unfortunately whenever I try to get in
its full of dishevelled destitute nanoco shareholders fighting
each for the bargains.

if you want to support a charity contribute to oxfam instead
of buying shares in nano

and how many dividend payments have you received
from nanoco's patent portfolio?

A company is worth what it produces and sells, not the number
of patents it owns. At the moment nanosys are visibly ahead
of nanoco in getting real product on the market.
Also it is telling that LG have pursued a collaboration with
nanosys after rejecting nanoco for unknown reasons

nigwit the share holder analysis page is updated every time nano
make a sale of their product, consequently you don't see many changes.

specific

the reply means nothing, as the RNS was non committal or spcific.

The only thief in the night or indeed any other time appears to be
ME and a latterly the pr rep watson granted a wadge of 18p share options
despite having only been with the company a short time, whilst PI's
were locked out. Quite frankly it stinks.

nano and their promoters have been using the nda excuse for eons.
publishing general sales figures not related to specific contracts
does not contravene any agreement they may have with customers.

ref all the links being posted for new tv's,
the key question is do any of them contain nano cfqd.
if so why are n't nano telling us

where does it say they are working AUO?

nigwit, if you read the link on advfn,the opening paragraph infers cpt are producing their own material

https://www.ledinside.com/news/2018/8/cpt_to_showcase_mini_led_and_qled_applications_for_automobiles

which if true is bad news for nanoco.

nigwit don't be a party pooper, publish the information on here
let us all in on the secret

the perspective of most holders is massive loss of money