Member Info for NigelHaemoglobin

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/ECO/update-on-gazania-1-well-offshore-south-africa-atkx87m2iugyy37.html

They had a discovery quite some time ago but did not inform the market that it was heavy oil for several months!

27%

********* *** **** ***

now let that be a list of asterisks for you

Untruthful, my placings and placing or partner posts have been spot on. Playing the money game with those events can be very effective.

Ostriches and sheep? you will never change from cradle to grave.

Hopefully he will learn but more importantly, listen...

Oz, nobody gives a Kangaroos butt about your science, all that matters is the C.O.S of the next well and how funds will be raised in the fail case.

Couldn't happen to a nicer dweeb...Slam dunk short now heavyweight engineering companies have all electric offers!

Good point but Griffiths has not exactly turned Morocco into a pin cushion with wells, have a look at Island and Fastnet Oil...

Little bit presumptuous Oz, plenty of Mr Bobs these days. The Sydney Mardi Gras has been pivotal in the development of progressive cultures...

Old fashioned Aussie misogyny, try and wind your neck in cobber, your nation has (thankfully) moved on...

Endless ramping of the same shiny reddit post, still, better than your hyper spectral messianic Michael Salt Caine Crisis twaddle.

Go away, boring person.

Typical Labour, creating negative politics about H&W. Of course some sub-assemblies will be made offshore by a NATO partner but the real gain is long term, that is to restore ship building skills in this nation for the long term! There is no risk that BAe, Bab**** and Cammel Laird will lose their maritime engineering capability at all.

It's all about growth and the red shirted tub thumping dweeb cannot see it!

Jan 2022 revision 2 CPR

Crystal clear!

Extremely childish post 'smart'.

HE1? Good Grief man haha! As for ezj and rkh executed 100's of trades: mostly successful thanks.

Look Sheep, you really have to be careful here, the next drill gcos is just 27% or near enough 1/4 bet, the oil wildcat is not funded, there were no partners willing to participate in the existing gas sketched out plan, Griffiths has negligible experience operating wells in Morocco which is not great at all considering as chief geo the location choice is his, we have had the most peculiar episode re Pilbeam, Theseus is a tad slimy for my liking.

Charlotte is a rational sceptic, I aim for similar. You have no idea about anything and would be better of with the TSB.

Read page 23 of the CPR again nerdball, 27% gcos.

Yes I did post some fatigue related guff recently but apologised for it, cannot find a way of post deletion.

The fact remains though that if PG and Lonny want to fart about wildcatting for difficult to commercialise oil I will continue aggressively managing my holdings around placing and drilling risks.

Just try and be honest with yourself about punting on E and P plankton.

The next well has a risk factor of 0.27 ie 27% geological chance of success, many assumptions have been made: in statistics confidence intervals are normally defined. Read almost any BMJ or Lancet paper and you will almost always see detailed statistical information.

Some useful info might come out of MOU-1, it may be producible with a lot of luck.

Therefore wee Seff keep it simple! your CO2 project reasoning for being here if not in abeyance is completely 'Donald Ducked'.

MOU-2, formerly '4 has a typical gcos for such a drill, better than a pure wildcat but still high risk. If you can do simple arithmetic try applying a commercial success factor? Go for a high one of say 50% and what is the result??

The SLR report is ok, the positively spun interpretation doing the rounds has to be viewed through frosty glazed sceptical spectacles!

Back to hold for the last few posts following rereads of the CPR. It is all well and good but what dilutions will be inflicted on our holdings if many more expo wells are needed?

Look at Fastnet and Island oil, Griffiths hasn't poked many holes in Morocco!!! err so to speak...

No, my mistake. Bit early in the morning over here, back to bed.

Sorry

Back to 'hold' for me. Why not target with as much precision as possible the low to medium risk gas target with a clear route to commercialisation? Clearly (but without full details yet) the gas target retains a very high degree of priority but how would onshore oil be commercialised? It's a much greater task to develop a trucking operation to a port or refinery.

An NED has gone, the main function of NED's is to mitigate the threat of Stockholm Syndrome ie what has occurred here with the odious trail of 'RH ankle biters led by Wing Commander Seffy Sefton haha!

Is the target elemental Helium or a stable isotope?

Just consider yourself fortunate that your defamatory post re QARANC was deleted at my request. Any more drivel of that type will find it's way to the MOD.

You and I both know what the consequences of that could be, yep you will end up working again but at a Wilco checkout.