Member Info for NGR1616

It doesn’t make sense to some…….

https://images.app.goo.gl/YRWUUJVzpQnd6cjN6

You deserved to be thrown in with the muppet generalisation TS. FH is worthy of being singled out.

I am hardly immune to being name called……[shrug shoulders emoji!]

Oh Flyinglower I reserve name calling only to those who truly deserve of it……and you sir are one such individual. You’re a dick. But to answer your question…..yes I do think other panel manufacturers would like to compete in the same market as Samsung and possibly do so competitively rather than leave it solely to Samsung to profit through a unique single source overpriced offering……not doing so is akin to suggesting no one should have challenged Ford at car making back in the day. Dick.

Display RNS imminent…….that’s my take on it.

TS I agree orders would be welcomed and are necessary in the indicated glide slope unless there’s a valid reason for a go around and another attempt to land orders. Interesting chat on ADVFN just now where Paul not on planet earth is quoting BT and is capable as interpreting what was guided from only one perspective…..his own.

IDL - big institutional investors don’t invest speculatively - they need to see revenue and profit.

I can’t believe someone invested in a company could or would describe those running that company in such derogatory terms. You should be ashamed of yourself but I doubt very much you’ll see the error of your ways.

Nanonano - I work for a specialist oil and gas company and our people need specific skills and experience. But for the overall health of the company we maintain a cash positive position whenever possible and that means control of overheads and people are the most expensive. Even if we have a high degree of confidence of an order we wait until it’s confirmed as is the nature of a commodity driven market, if the price drops work can be deferred and not return until the price recovers….in the meantime you’ll end up making people redundant days or weeks after hiring possibly after enticing them from a stable career somewhere else……that’s going to ruin their lives and our reputation as a company who values their workforce

You don’t know that. The commercial terms could be finalised today and all the job adverts tomorrow…..or next month or later in the year. Your troubles seem to stem from impatience…..

*employ (written in haste!)

Why would you employee people in advance of an order? That’s poor management. If the orders are delayed you have increased your overheads. The orders will not require fulfilling tomorrow and the supply chain and commercial agreements will factor in a glide slope to delivery.

After spending years with an open mind arguing against the group mentality it’s clear why Nannogeddon

“All of whom should be sacked immediately”.

Based on what? The ramblings of you Flighingondrugs, clearly a dribbling imbecile with no knowledge of the negotiation other than the outcome? Muppet.

https://youtu.be/KjmjqlOPd6A

Some people only hear what they want to hear. If you go back knowing what you know now the tune isn’t the same.

Yes I researched and posted what he said the other day which was met instead of with acknowledging terms he used such as “POTENTIALLY transformative” with claims instead that I was being desperate! There’s no getting through to some.

Go research them yourselves and post here as I did but this time precisely where and when he said it was a nailed on win worth many hundreds of millions!

He doesn’t need to buy any. This was covered in recent comms.

Have you not simply understood that the negotiating position wasn’t as strong as you managed convince yourselves?

I was at the Vatican museum yesterday and the Sistine chapel before enjoying some Aperol Spritz in a piazza in the sun thinking about how group religious beliefs and groups on share chat boards have so many similarities.

Later today we’re off to the colosseum

Conclusion

Netlist is a hazardous play because of the unknown factor in litigation.

But because they won on different technology and it would appear undeniable and indisputable wilful infringement you guys have concluded we are the same and BT simply “bottled it”. That he ignored the certainty of a win x damages multiple whilst his lawyers and backers and advisers were telling him to go all the way because there was no risk of losing…..

Imbecilic mindsets on display here in full gamut.