Member Info for Nejc113

When a commercial investor comes in on this, the stock will be in range of GBP… not in p…

i’m in the sm club to… so i stick to the end with this company :d … if investment or the energy business would be easy, everyone would do it. doing business, invest or push new product in “old” industries is difficult and risky. i believe in the product, yes the timeline delays are crazy. but we all bet on a new product and in a potential of multiple investment return.

i still want to test the theory, study fundamentals invest, and stay until the end on the path. if ****ed up, you know it, but you are not jumping from path to path without fix direction and you never achieve the goal…. so yes i’m in the sm community and will walk to the end. i just can hope, as we all do, that the path will be worth it.

Just a bunch of pointless discussions… and all time low… so if you didn’t wanted to buy in you didn’t miss anything… and you can go for next few weeks for some news and few months for the times when we all know if we are richer or poorer:D

With Morocco sign of contract the company has enough to survive and minimum of 50m/year income. So the statement of 100% SP raise for Morocco is much to low. With tests compleate we need to come on 0.05-0.1GBP, with contract sign 0.1-0.5GBP. This is just my assumption or meaning, now everyone can add theirs, but we do not sit on a stock with potential of 100%, but in the same timeframe next year we can have the SP on 0.000000000, or 0.5-1GBP

No idea what will be first. First money can come from Valcor, first contract from Morocco. If/when Tests with our shipping partner starts I’m sure that SP will go substantially upwards.

But because of lack of informations I will be quiet until something happens. The money should not be a problem for now, but we lost now years with the timelines multiple times changed.

And we do not know what is happening behind the curtains, I hope a lot. But we will see, I think the time margin is used up and the company has to show results in next months, or our investment goes bust.

But I’m still here because I belive in the product, and I believe this product has future. If the product or my bet is placed in the right company I’m not sure anymore. We will see… For the new ones on other hand you have the option to risk small money on the potential, for us it has to be a big change upwards, that we see our investment back.

Lets hope that the company can provide and stops with excuses.

From my view I think the same… I truly believe in the product of QED… because of this I’m heavily invested and have big losses until now…

But as I said once, this is a test for me… I’m testing my patients :) and I hope I set on the right horse… if not I have to rethink my strategy, and speak with my wife how much of the money I put on this horse :D…

So yes I can not see another product on the market that would solve some trouble in the industry… But yes, let’s wait until end of 2024, so I/we can tell what we where thinking ;)

How I remember the trial should start end of this month or in beginning of next. Have we newer information on that?

We have talked few times about Green methanol, and yes there is not enough for the shipping industry. Now European Union will allow green fuels for cars, so methanol and other e fuels for shipping industry are off the table. If some still do not believe, ask yourself… when there will be so much green electric energy overproduction, that e fuels will be produced in such amounts that sufficient supply can be achieved for Planes, Cars and Shipping:D …. And please do not start with ammonia or hydrogen, there is the same source….

How I remember the start of test should be end of Jun. or Start of July…. I hope news will come in next days…

Here is someone playing chess with a checkmate strategy…

What is the biggest problem of alternative fuels. I believe supply, what is QED doing…

Push and a new product with a sufficient flexibility and assure testing upfront for different sources.

I just hope the strategy will go up :D… if yes, QED will be ready for sufficient supply from the start further.

When Sock-puppets come out it’s a signal for me to buy and hold.
I was afraid what will be with QED because all where gone, but now I know the news are behind the corner :D

Methanol is not = Green Methanol. And the production of 4-6% now or up to 30% in the next years to come of green Methanol vs conventional is not enough to supply the shipping industry. If we take in account other consumers this path as others is still limited.

https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/energies/energies-13-03113/article_deploy/energies-13-03113-v2.pdf?version=1592806874

As I understand QED offers a platform for dirty business as HFO is to go greener in short term. Because the Biofuels and other alternatives are not capable to offer sufficient supply and flexibility, what MSAR with BioMSAR offers. They can be blended in different % with water and other sources, as Vertoro project/product or glycerin as byproduct of biofuels production.
So statement we do not want to supply whole MSC is false. We want and are capable to do so. The customer has the flexibility to run on MSAR or BioMSAR if the supply of bio blends is sufficient. But as I see we have the only technology what offers the possibility to change fuel in short time and run more efficient and greener with existing infrastructure and ships/plants.

The article I see as a comment on biofuels (let see clean ones, as biodiesel) not in our field of operation and their supply is limited today.

Why would a big player wait when a company has a MCAP of 20mil :p And 60+ mil on tax reserve(correct me if I have not correct numbers)…. So basics economics speak for buyout now if someone wants…

OHS
I didn’t know we are in fertiliser business or evaporation plants what are needed for running MVR.

Please invest in knowledge in what you put your money.

Many who invested made their calculations, and we know what crazy potential is in this product.

Some time ago we needed opportunity’s to show the potential and prove it. Now we need patience to go to the end of the road and see what will be there for us. From my investment point of view i lost more then 50%, but I think abbaut this as a lesson for how patient I can be and if this strategy is the real one.

But I will not put more money in this game, as the risk for my portfolio has to get under control again :D. So let see what will the numbers tell in one or two years.

Has anybody other stocks with similar potential in focus? So I have something to do in this time :D

I think this has nothing to do with QFI, if nothing else investors are on the search for new opportunities, What QFI is. Until now I think big investors are watching QFI and will jump in when the risk is lower, my assumption is that in the moment we have some cash flow there is no limit for them.

I have seen this ships too when I started reading abbaut ammonia and shipping today.. but as I said, everything is possible on a paper, but between ammonia ready, ammonia usage and first accident there are big questions in the air… I still can not believe that ammonia as a fuel is so good that someone take the risk of accident in account… https://nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb/documents/fs/0084.pdf

Haggis I have read the report and the risk is not jet under control, there are just written some hazards and some solutions with references on other industries.

From this industry (productions plants) I come as designer, so I know how to deal with in a Plant design or transport. But there are two many risks involved on a ship with the combination of personal, movement of ship, …. I know there is transport going on, but this is a special ship, with high skilled personal under controlled routes, ports….

I really do not see Amonia as a fuel on any ship. It would be to complex design, to high risk, to expensive…. So the industry will not implement it if they can produce synthetic diesel for comparable amount of energy and same sources.

And with methanol is a similar question, if you have a low energy density, you have to have a bigger volume of tanks for the same trip. So the question is, does it make sense to build a bigger ship for les capacity?

The hazard’s are smaller, but still if such ship starts to burn, you have a big problem.

When you ask me, I would say a synthetic fuel what is made like diesel from e hydrogen make sense. So better properties as now (like diesel), known technology, same or les dangers, all the ships do not need to be new…. And after all you still can make blends like MSAR or BioMSAR to use waste byproducts from other industry’s…. And make the fuel cheaper….