Member Info for needalife

Adikt, when you say to your mind,

has anything ever been published by anyone, or any information issued by the company,

that to your mind doesn't produce something positive or reinforcing what you've previously posted

CMG.

I'm done with you.

you can't argue idiot.

post something factual

CMG

your now following the wishful thinkers to a t.

unable to justify ridiculous claims when challenged.

so resort to claiming whoever questions your sh**the doesn't hold shares, or is paid to disrupt the board.

try posting some facts, not the first thing that comes into your child like head.

Aquinaga/chippy.

can't stop yourself can you,

chip, chip.

chip, chip

chippy.

CMG.

until you start posting a scrap of evidence to support your fantasy,

I will add you to the bbg, dbw and adikts of the board.

notsure, do you not think my correcting peoples grammar, is showing that

I D G A F,

as I've said before nobody on here has a clue as to why my grammar is abysmal.

it's not hindered my life in anyway whatsoever.

it worries you far more than it ever will me

CMG.

I take it as no link,

wishful thinking,

no amount of posting wishful thinking, turns fantasy into facts.

and also that link is simply a legal firm advertising there services,

nothing more, nothing less,

try putting some facts around your little schoolboy ducks in a row

1984.

Shouldn't there be a comma somewhere in your sentence.

I guess you must of missed it out, in your haste to reply.

Redknight.

I guess you MUST OF missed yesterday's ut.

Funny how you report religiously, when it closes in positive territory, yet seem to overlook it when negative.

Cmg.

I never made anything up to suit my agenda.

I simply cut and pasted a paragraph from the link disproving what you proported to be positive news for solg.

I try to stick to facts, not wishful thinking.

Talking of which.

Your earlier post.

"Major investors, scrambling over each other for a higher stake or maybe a straight buyout. ✅"

I wonder if you could post a link confirming this.

I must of missed it.

Or am I to assume my above statement, regarding wishful thinking applies

Cash mygyro.

Interestingly, the report reinforces my post, ref the headwind still facing us.

"Nonetheless, investments in natural resources are subject to unstable political and economic scenarios,".

Thanks for posting links that support my facts.

Keep up the good work.

1984, we could have £1 a share t shirts printed, and hold a £1 a share party to celebrate.

Ohhhhhhhh, hang on, we had that 8 years ago.

Ohhhhhhhh, hang on, no we didn't, it got canceled.

We all brought shirts in our excitement, but never reached the dizzy heights.

Were are we now.

Ohhhhhhhhhhh, 9p

Just a little nightcap.

A report from Bnamericas, ref the court over ruling the government.

Note the paragraph on the risk to foreign investment.

"Silva: The situation is complex. We have a constitutional court whose rulings discourage foreign investment. The decision on the environmental consultation is not the only one. Several others influence the arrival of foreign investment.

Our economy is dollarized. We require foreign investment, but the decisions of the court often stop that investment, as well as the decisions of local judges.

We are a new industry in the country and require legal certainty and a clear regulatory framework to function.

We are a country full of resources in the soil and the subsoil, but it needs an environment of legal certainty because capital will go where safer legal frameworks are offered to invest."

So many headwinds

1984.

Allthough it will be a bitter pill to swallow, I can afford to lose my modest investment. Unlike many poor souls on here.

Allbeit I don't expect to.

Ive made it my mission in life to put a bit of realism into the fantasy world of the one share holding wonder experts on here.

And talking of experts. I'm still waiting for a reply adikt

The institute of American countries.

Actually mentions cascabel adikt.

"SolGold’s Cascabel concession in close proximity to the Colombian/Ecuadorian border, is an investor's nightmare. In reports, SolGold has indicated that mining material will be transported, via pipeline, 60 km north west from Cascabel towards San Lorenzo, a known organised crime hot spot. From San Lorenzo, the pipeline will then continue 100km south west to the port of Esmeraldas, where there is significant organised crime activity."

Is that enough evidence adikt.

Or should I carry on.

Facts, facts, facts

Reuters report on illegal mining.

More evidence.

"Criminal mining activities in Ecuador financed by criminal groups such as Los Choneros and Los Lobos are on the rise and represent a serious threat to the country’s security and its sensitive ecosystems. This has become one of the main financing sources for these criminal organizations, bankrolling their acquisition of high-quality heavy weapons. The militarization of the territories affected by criminal mining will intensify even more in the current internal war imposed by the Ecuadorian government."

Ecuador country commercial guide.

Is this the evidence you need.

"Illegal mining continues to be a principal threat to expanding legal mining operations and investment. Illegal miners undertook violent attacks on legal mining concessions throughout Ecuador in 2023, and the Ecuadorian government lacks sufficient security resources and funding to protect legal mining concessions and effectively go after illegal mining. Companies may need to employ security for themselves.

Facts, facts, facts.

Adikt.

Did you not read the post.

The government can't provide the security legal mines in production need.

Companies will need to provide there own security.

The constitional courts have thrown out appeals by the government to get mines into production.

So they clearly won't be issuing FA till they sort that out.

What's the point if the judiciary over rules them

The violence in ecuador is escalating again.

He's reintroduced emergency powers, declaring the government is at war with the gangs.

Who by the way are better armed than the military.

Now you sit in Cuckoo land in denial, for as long as you like.

If you think none of the above affect solg and any investment decisions. Carry on spinning wishful thinking as facts

Your more out of your depth than I thought

If solg attempt to take it to production.

It will be worse than worthless.

Nobody on here would of brought solg shares if they thought it would be 20 years for a return.

Not even adikt could spin a positive from that.

And to be excited about a port expansion in 10 years is laughable.

And by the way, they have been talking about that port expansion, for as long as the uk talked about the channel tunnel.

Decades.

Dbw doesn't mention that in his excitement

Dbw.

You do realise, that if as seems likely, nobody wants solg, and if highly unlikely, solg attempt to take cascabel to production,

You will have held solg shares for over 20 years.

10 of which you told us daily, a sale is imminent.

And with 20 years inflation, your shares will be worth SFA

Also dbw. I read that report on the 6th of May.

Try to keep up.