Member Info for Mukiwa

“Another idiot gambler loading up before the next cash raise.

Go on, I dare you... Buy loads!”

@C2645sg — Genuine question: who is the bigger idiot?

Someone who openly admits AML is a gamble, buys at historically low prices, understands the risks of dilution, a future cash raise, or even failure, but believes the upside could outweigh the downside?

Or someone who spent years claiming AML was doomed, going bankrupt and heading for collapse, yet somehow passed up the opportunity to make an absolute fortune shorting it all the way down?

🤷

Aston Martin to unveil limited-edition manual GT at The Quail.

Potentially 150 units only at approx. $2.3 million each.

Source: The Supercar Blog

https://www.thesupercarblog.com/exclusive-aston-martin-to-unveil-limited-edition-manual-gt-at-the-quail/

@C26 — “‘Today’ was a typo btw, no idea where it came from. I know when cash is running out, but not to the exact day.”

You do realise how contradictory and foolish that sounds? 🤦‍♂️

So you don’t actually know then. Yet you still expect everyone to believe your constant drivel and negative posting as if it’s fact. Same repetitive fear-mongering routine again.

Beware of paid derampers.

Aston Martin Making Progress With Turnaround Efforts — Market Talk

14:37 · May 13

Dow Jones Newswires

“Aston Martin’s turnaround is progressing, but there is little downside to waiting on the sidelines until there is proof of strategic progress, Bernstein analysts write. Quality issues have been fixed, headcount has been rightsized and the Valhalla launch is on time, the bank says. There is confidence that with the new strategy, management can make a viable business, Bernstein says. Performance will be driven by margin expansion from Valhalla deliveries, new high-margin limited-production models, and further cost efficiencies. ‘The rerating potential is considerable if Aston demonstrates it can increase gross margins, generate cash and if some of the valuation gap to luxury peers is closed.’ It rates Aston Martin stock at market-perform with a 50 pence target price. Shares fall 2% to 45.92 pence.”

The Telegraph article provides a valid opinion, and yes, with AML’s current fundamentals and history, another cash raise is certainly possible — maybe even likely. Nobody is denying that this share is a gamble.

But that’s very different from the agenda of a paid deramper like C26 and his various IDs, who spend all day posting the same negative headlines, cherry-picking opinions, and presenting speculation as fact.

Everyone invested knows the risks. At these prices, either the upside eventually comes good, or the lights get switched off and we all move on!!

@The.Crowman — genuine question: what exactly is your agenda in AML if you’re not invested? Racking up 1,400+ posts on a free chat board about one stock you supposedly have no position in could also be described as not normal behaviour.

“There will be a cash raise today for this, because they run out of money every few weeks.”

C26 — so where was this “cash raise today” you were confidently predicting? Village idiot strikes again. 🤡

And while you’re at it, confirm exactly how much of these so-called “billions” in tariff losses actually affects AML — and how much of it was not already reported or included in guidance.

Otherwise, it’s just the usual negative drivel: taking a wider industry headline, twisting it into AML doom, and hoping nobody checks the detail.

@TruthChecker — no, C26 isn’t invested, he’s a paid deramper. Nobody would be such a complete mug driver posting 5,000+ negative comments on a free chat board about one stock they supposedly have no position in.

C26 did admit that he “gets off on it”, but surely there’s a limit. Repetitively posting negative drivel and attacking anyone positive about the company thousands of times is hardly normal behaviour. 🤷‍♂️

I’d suggest just ignoring him — or simply highlighting his fictitious drivel for exactly what it is, if you have the time.

C26 — you can’t have it both ways.

You’ve always criticised AML for pushing wholesale in Q4 to inflate numbers, and now Q1 shows the planned reversal — lower wholesales and dealer de-stocking — exactly as guided, you suddenly present it as a negative.

This is all within 2025 guidance and reflected in Q1 reporting, so what exactly has changed?

You’re now claiming worse results and another cash raise for Q2 — based on what? Everything you’ve listed is already known and guided. Management under Hallmark has been quite consistent, and when things change, they’re communicated via RNS/updates.

So where is this claim coming from — do you have inside information, or can you provide a credible source for these worse results and cash raise predictions?

Otherwise, it’s just the same repetitive drivel about a company with weak fundamentals: taking known facts, spinning them negatively, and calling it insight.

C26, new ID again I see!!

Let’s see if you can hit another 5,000+ posts as a “non-paid deramper” and “non-investor” on a free chat board.

Ah, now it really makes sense — you and C26, same ID, same lack of thinking, and no power of wisdom.

Stating we’d all want 95p in these current market conditions? About as useful as asking if the Pope is Catholic. Brilliant insight — truly groundbreaking.

And that 95→90 “headline”? My response at the time was calling out yet more fear-mongering. Just more of the same.

C26 — Once again, you prove you’re not the sharpest tool in the box.

Why are you repeating posts I’ve already made? Nothing has changed. My view hasn’t changed, my opinion hasn’t changed, and the facts haven’t changed — other than the share price moving more than anticipated. What I wrote was clear and logical — even you should be able to understand it.

I’ve always said it’s a gamble, and at least I’m invested and own that.

All your repeated posts do is try to bury the reality: 7,000+ posts on a board you claim you’re not invested in and not paid to comment on. That’s the real story!!

You keep pushing scare-mongering headlines, yet much of what you’ve claimed has proven to be inaccurate or unfounded. Repeating it over and over doesn’t turn it into fact. When the argument falls apart, you flood the board with new noise to distract from it.

Post as much as you like, but it doesn’t change the facts.

Clown 🤡

C26 — Clearly, wisdom has been chasing you all your life, but you’ve always been just too fast!!

You call investors stupid and idiots, but at worst they were naive or greedy and trying to stay optimistic — they are invested and it’s their investment.

All you’ve done is follow a company with weak fundamentals and claim genius for pointing it out. Over the years, your “facts” on fundraisings, facilities and volumes have been wrong time and time again — yet you ignore that and cling to headline negativity to make yourself look clever. That’s not insight — that’s fear-mongering.

And 7,000+ posts across multiple IDs on a stock you claim you’re not invested in and not paid to comment on, while calling everyone else stupid or idiots, surely epitomises stupidity at its highest level. 🤷

@C2645sg - The only imagination on display is yours. The article describes consultation and cost-cutting, not collapse; you’re just rebranding restructuring as doom.

The numbers will decide.

"Every SINGLE message you have written is about me".

“Egotism is the anaesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity.”

An old classic comes to mind.

Not all of my posts are about you; they’re about calling out your repetitive, fictitious waffle — the kind a paid deramper uses to dominate a forum. If you choose to see that as grandeur, that’s your perception, not mine. 🤷

“All the idiot rampers say the same: ‘wait and see’. Then the results come out and you all disappear for five days because I was right again.”

@CG645sg — not everyone is fortunate enough to disappear to Africa for six months on an unpaid holiday, like you did after a set of results. 🤷

C2645sg- let’s see when the results come out, as they will be facts.

If this were real, material information, AML would be required to disclose it to shareholders. “No links”, “trust me”, or “email IR like I did” isn’t proof. You made the claim, you prove it.

I’m not competing with a paid deramper pushing unverifiable worst-case noise. The numbers will do the talking — everything else is just paid fictitious waffle.

C2645SG — sometimes I just have to accept you’re not the sharpest tool in the box.

This is how it works, you’ve made yet another negative claim, so it’s on you to verify it with a credible source if it’s true. I’m calling you out for posting fiction dressed up as fact.

Telling people to “Google it”, “ask AI”, or “trust me, I know people” isn’t verification. Asking others to contact Investor Relations to prove your assertion is just shifting the burden of proof.

If your claim were true and material, AML would be expected to address it properly via an official update.

So post a source (RNS/filing/official statement) or accept it’s just more noise.

@c2645sg – link please if you’re claiming the valhalla can’t be sold in the us because it hasn’t passed crash and emissions tests and “only dealers have them.”

if you have an official source or ****logation report stating it hasn’t met us standards and therefore cannot be sold there, please post it. otherwise this looks like speculative negativity rather than documented fact — classic behaviour a paid deramper is known for:

repeats dramatic, factually incorrect claims.

ignores official company statements and filings.

obsessively highlights worst-case scenarios without balanced context.

posts incessantly to dominate the thread and drown out facts.

links or it’s just noise.

c26 — twenty years ago you’d have been called a complete mong child and a ******. i’m not sure what the current woke/pc equivalent is, but the meaning hasn’t changed.

relentless posting, zero balance, mistaking repetition for intelligence, and claiming genius for riding weak fundamentals. when the price goes green you vanish to africa on a 6 month holiday; when it drops you reappear, rewriting history.

don’t forget the classic paid deramper playbook:

-repeats dramatic, factually incorrect claims.

- ignores official company statements and filings.

- obsesses over worst-case scenarios, never balanced analysis.

- posts non-stop to dominate the board and drown out facts.

@c2645sg Link please. If you’re stating “DBX is doomed”, “no Specials for sale”, and “only a handful of Valhalla in 2025”, back it with sources (RNS/filings/investor deck) — not just opinion.

Don’t forget the classic paid deramper playbook:

- Repeats dramatic, factually incorrect claims.

- Ignores official company statements and filings.

- Obsesses over worst-case scenarios, never balanced analysis.

- Posts non-stop to dominate the board and drown out facts.