Re Re: Shanta Lot better metrics then Doropo?1 Jan 2024 13:39
I noted some some discussion regrading if Centamin should be looking would be getter to consider looking at Shanta projects as a possible alternative to developing Doropo, so with that in mind I asked a well respected and experienced mining analyst for their opinion, unfortunately I am unable tip get some of the charts to post on here , but there is enough to show that Centamin would be well advised to apply the barge pole to any such idea!
The Analyst's opinion
I started looking into Shanta, but had to give up when coming to looking into operational financial performance of the New Luika Mine. They are not provided by the company. It is an AIM listed company and can get away by giving no information. The usual practice of companies that are not listed in Canada. They give all kinds of non-relevant information (e.g. the number Board meetings attended), but nothing on waste stripping, operating cost, etc.
(Unable to print chart )
What is evident however that this company has never managed to return any cash to its shareholders since 2013 (No financials on their website before that despite being listed in 2005).
Amazingly there is no financial information for the 2023 year, not even interim results.
The table above shows that the company absorbed US$53 million of shareholders funds as a going concern and NEVER returned a cent!
Moreover, the best days of this mine are past as is shown in the graph below: the plant feed grade has dropped dramatically over time.
The New Luika Mine has supposedly a LOM ending in 2027, should no further reserves be added from current exploration. The production rate is between 70,000 and 75,000 ounces per annum. Actual production in 2022 was 65,000 ops, so they forecast an increase. On the basis of what?
The new Singida mine is supposed to add between 32,000 ozs and 38,000 ops per year. Therefore a small operation with bad economies of scale. The grade is between 3.0 g/t and 3.70 g/t, but with a high strip ratio of almost 14 with much higher rates in the earlier years.
The West Kenia project has a good grade of 5.55 g/t Au, but I am clueless about the exact technical parameters. It would be another production centre with its own overheads and I suppose another corporate office within Kenia.
In conclusion, the company does not impress me. The projects look on paper OK, but historically the company could not generate cash from the New Luika Mine when it had a grade above 5 g/t Au. If the company does not have the confidence to provide technical reports substantiating the attractiveness of new projects, why should you have such confidence. No wonder Centamin does not consider Shanta. Centamin should not waste their time on small projects when they have bigger ones to consider.!
Regards