Member Info for MrRipley

Exactly GM. So how come those computer generated signals are now less important than they were before? Can any Chartist answer that without first accepting that DMAs are horse**** and they should in this instance be totally dismissed? And if they’re all saying strong buy now, and should be ignored because of a gap then how come on bad news a gap down should be ignored and it’s back to DMA? It’s all quite obviously crap.

Nice posting history Zendog? I’m guessing you’ve sent Sir Al a letter by now, using letters cut out of a newspaper and stuck onto some A4? Mental.

#Sniff sniff# It’s Eggy in here isn’t it.

I’ve just had a little look on trading view. Now as we know, technical analysis is drawing 700 lines on a chart and then swivelling it around until it fits your narrative. One of the baloney sandwich favourites is the moving average. We’ve had many a poster appear to tell us this is bearish, that is bullish, yada yada, often citing the moving average. So I had a look on trading view and the 20, 50, 100, 200 Daily moving average all point to this being a strong buy. So why isn’t bingo bongo borgo pointing that out? Why when he has previously cited us moving below one of these horse **** indicators has he pointed out its a bearish signal? Why is it now all about the gap? You see folks? This whole FUDery of traders is a big pile of horse ****. All the DMAs point to strong buy. So why cherry pick their narrative? Because it suits their trade. Bingo Borg has called many wrong. They all have. If they were so great they’d be too busy in Monaco to be posting their absolute tripe, for free, for pats on the back and follows/likes.

I’d be amazed if eggy isn’t our old FUD master flex, the duster.

Protesting too much here PL…. Admit it. You’re eggy waffle aren’t you!? Reveal yourself. And Wyndrone. I always knew it. ****ing Derek over here.

I fully agree with balanced views, but if we got offered 10bn they’d say oh well it’s not really £10bn when you factor in inflation by the time we get it blah blah blah. Being balanced isn’t being argumentative about everything even if what they’re saying is just plain incorrect or lies.

But we aren’t thick, FUDers. It’s quite obvious what you’re doing, but it’s also cringey and embarrassing because it’s so obvious. What you want is ambiguity so try and keep enough fear in here (knowing how many eyes are on it) to keep it bouncing around for your trading. You’ll go quiet again on the rise or ramp it. You’re in the boy who cried wolf territory now. Nobody is falling for it. Therapeutic levels of Dox in 6 biopsies is not ambiguous. Therapeutic levels. Therapeutic. Much higher than outside the tumour. Thera……. Peeeeuuuutic. Get it? So you’re either so thick that you genuinely don’t understand what that means, or you’re being intentionally obtuse. Which is it?

Sorry RampyPumpy. The other one is porn involving peanut butter and poodles.

Its RampyPampyCircleJerk@myspace.Napster.Net.nz. You’re welcome.

Or is it the trading floor. Whatever it is, todays price action, and the price action often this week, has been bizarre. No amount of buying is pushing this up, exactly, as pointed out by Timster, like when Jupiter were allowed to exit.

Sorry Oliver smith haha. Fck sake, I’m going back to sleep.

Ahh thanks to Charlie Oliver on Twitter. Seems to be the platform I’m on having a meltdown.

Well I’ve never seen that. A 139 flashes up under the bid in Red (which normally happens as they’re removed) but it wasn’t there to remove. The 149 was replaced with a 150 at the same time. All seems very parculiar the past few days. A few times trades haven’t seemed to budge the SP on iota either.

Anyway. What do I know. I’m sure it’s just MMs churning out some funds for the weekend Charlie.

You ever seen that before? Seems like they just suddenly vanished into thin air. What could the reason be?

Anyone else looking at level 2 here? We seem to have absolutely no depth. Only 3 MMs. Bids are 147, 145 and 140. I’ve never seen it look that shallow. Seems really odd. Anyone else on any other level 2?

Seems a bit of a weird game to get some churn into what is a very low volume day.

Suddenly a load of trades have appeared at the exact same time.

Not large, just a few K each. I actually thought an RNS had appeared. Very very odd trade action. Like a bots putting them through.

Yeah he’s a really balanced contributor and clearly knows what he’s talking about.

…… you aren’t Cellar Boy are you Bein?

And I agree. There’s always it must be this or that. But it never is. What I do consider to be a possibility is the trial design and the Max cumulative dose being reviewed and a potential for a less conservative (but not wild) increase in dose.