Member Info for MrRipley

You get to £9 and you just keep going.

HUA, dose escalation of AVA6000, initial readout for AVA6000, TT complete with ABDX, some clarity as to the role of Medusa and their Meduflow branded test. All to look out for in the near term.

Anyone fancy discussing Avacta?

Building bridges RD.

Just think people need to let the company do the talking.

When the good news does land, especially the likes of first readout for AVA6000, idiots posting Level 2 is on fire every 3 minutes will completely bury any good feedback from posters who can fully understand the numbers and make a circus of the board for any new investors.

My point is I find it odd that ABDX had positive news of substantial orders. That’s actual good news. We know Meduflow is a real thing. That’s good news. Maybe the lock up is just a rushed draft hence the spelling mistake. Which isn’t a big deal. BRHs sudden rise on, NCYT rode ABDX and now ODX showing a bizarre box on a window. Just think it’s all either snippets of truth mixed on with the now absent iceman and teams pumping (which I believe harms sentiment and puts people off, so should be banned) and if it were all crap then Avacta would have commented. I would personally rather wait for the red dot. I’m pretty sure it’s all coming together, but the crazed pumping of yesterday doesn’t help anyone. Nice to put Jupiter under pressure though.

Is ODX. So that’s ABDX, NCYT, BRH, Avct and now ODX

Just find it bizarre Mowzer, that in an age of technology, or that anyone would find it difficult to use this test. Maybe we all use our thumbs too much and our fingers have become defunct. A few revolutionary leaps and we’ll evolve into iguanodons (joke for anyone who likes dinosaurs there…… NDN lend me that tumbleweed would you. Stop hogging it, I need it over here)

Have to say conf, if you’re struggling to use the Affidx test then you must have teeth like highland toffee because there’s no way you can wield a tooth brush in anger. The snap off has never caused me problems. The buffer sachet is as fiddly as the sauce sachet in a pot noodle and if you find the cap at the top too difficult to manoeuvre then you must have the dexterity of Edward Scissor Hands in a tidily wink contest.

…… tumbleweed………

The constant ramping will genuinely put investors off unless they have a mental age of 5. Please stop.

Kaboooom rockets. Buys flooding in. Well done all holders. 1.37 by Friday. £10 by end of this sentence. Not long now. The mole catchers bought back in. Just got off the phone to Boris, he can’t find the minutes of the meeting but him and Big Al are going glamping this weekend.

Give me a shout at 137.

Sorry RX. Me and Wyn are a lot like the Richard Burton and Liz Taylor. Except if instead of those 2 it was Michael Barrymore and that fella he drowned. Anyway I’m done.

No they just don’t want to discuss it with you for the millionth time

“The thing about testing is that it won't stop you getting it. You are just deferring to time you do.”

Right so you’re vaccinated. You get covid. You do a test. You stay home. You don’t spread it. That’s the idea behind testing. It reduces the number of positive cases by reducing contacts between infected and none infected. The narrative the gov has pushed is it stops the spread when it doesn’t.

Anyway. I can’t stand you long enough to keep this up. Just being honest.

Goodbye.

The whole conversation was about stopping the spread.

I just gave examples of how it wouldn’t have to be the whole country. You chose to ignore that. So it wouldn’t cost 52bn at all.

Again the conversation was to do with stopping the spread and how vaccines are innefective. Do we just keep vaccinating people for ever, restricting travel unless your vaccines, which don’t stop the spread, are up to date? What’s the cost to the economy there? What’s the collective cost of vaccinating a population repeatedly where most will survive? That brings us to the next option, just letting it rip through the country. That’s gone well, we created the delta variant. You note other diseases that kill more than covid, so do we just live with another 250 dead a week? On top of other preventable diseases? What’s the cost to the economy then and the pressure on the NHS? If the vaccine doesn’t stop the spread then why sack so many health workers? Is that acceptable?

Anyway. Before this bores the board to death. Ta ta.

To stop the spread. Yes. Did I say the most economic? No. The most economic would be as Boris Johnson said “let the bodies pile high”. If it was centred around areas of dense population or into areas where the numbers are driving north then that would be more economic. But it’s undeniable to say that mass testing or surge testing is the way to stop the spread. Mass vaccinations has, by the current numbers, done **** all.

Doctor, I go to the gym 3 times a week and I’m the only person in a very busy gym who wipes anything down before and after use. It’s disgusting. Gyms are a funny one really, it’s mostly young and fit people who don’t believe it effects them (to a point, they’re correct) but the gyms take no responsibility for enforcing cleanliness. As far as testing goes I think that’s one place where testing would help a lot, but not every time people go due to the fact they just wouldn’t do it. If the whole country did 2-3 tests per week then that I’m my opinion is the most effective while being achievable and realistic solution. But it won’t happen.

Then they must be injecting us with ****. Here’s some data….. point to the bit where vaccines have dropped the case level…..

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

“If you’ve chosen not to have the jab for no good reason then the NHS should be able to choose not to treat you”

Why? It doesn’t stop the spread. So why would someone who is 21, needs an operation but has always been physically fit and healthy need the vaccine? I don’t get this idea. This is a side effect of the media brainwashing that the vaccine will end covid. It will never end covid at all. Again, that’s a fact. It reduces deaths and hospitalisations amongst those at a higher risk. That and the possible lower risk of long covid is it. People don’t seem able or willing to accept that. It’s also a dangerous narrative that’s been put out there by the tories to get the jab and stop the spread. The campaign should have been get the jab to stop limit the risk of long covid and reduce hospitalisations and deaths, and to stop the spread continue to wash your hands and wear a mask in crowded places. Testing at mass gatherings would have the positive case numbers down by a much greater degree than the vaccine ever would. But how do you spin positivity out of the need to stay cautious, when you’re busy doing whatever the **** you like as the Tory party have been.

Enforced lockdown for the unvaccinated by a government who show a total arrogance with regards to rules for them and rules for us. Who spent more time fingering their aids than abiding by the rules. A vaccine which loses potency faster than viagra in a 95 year old. For a disease which is survived by almost everyone. No. Locking down the unvaccinated is not the answer at all. Testing is the answer and always has been. But they’ve got their big innova/Randox backhanders. I for one would not be paying attention to the rule of lockdown if that were the case (though I am vaccinated.). It’s a persons choice to be injected with a vaccine. It is however still the sensible thing to do for the vulnerable but where one thing leads to another, the people of Britain should not bow down to the demands of the unconcerned and self serving few. Testing is the way to stop the spread. Vaccines are not. That’s a fact.