Member Info for MrHumble

AN ideal spot if in at the low range, not to be letting holding go slip into the red again. Because that's basically a spike that just occurred. Nice position to be in though. Find out for free in essence.

All down to that channel really. Great hold if breaks it, otherwise, same ol

Spike or hold price?

https://x.com/YankTrain17909/status/1962430391807037630

Yes might as well join the 60p share price haha

Don't know why it does not register Pompey. I said before it does not matter who the CEO is. Be the same as getting a new broker you al wanted. Irrelevant

Everyone knows the 3 fundamental pillars that must align. Structure - Flow - Mathematical validation

But most use one only. So if you look at market here, or tbf, in most, say how they can manipulate each, but cant the combined?

I have to say one thing does impress me here. The underlying construct of how to fleece. These guys are good. Not talking about the board. They wouldn't know much about those things. Just told what to do haha

Well **** this. Now that the golden parachute salary reward has been raised for past services provided, this will stink and drift for ages

GLA

OPTI different. It had similar around 20p so a warning. But different at 11.25 due to other data that's a state secret

Enjoy Xmas all. Cant be arsed to post here again. Hope you find the right optimal future dump price

Those high % F-options on sbtx were dumps - not buys. Re in that instance, the optionality was for putting that cash into the floor raises to come.

It's an easy game really. Well, for europeans, americans and asians. Dont know why others try make it so complex

Here is future optionality over a longer timeframe. Once you see the F-options taken, you know a raise is going to come low at some stage (little caps)

The recent 17p raise? Just a thank you agreement (salaries)

https://x.com/YankTrain17909/status/1962087745083314507

Just a piece of a tip of an iceberg in rationale skid. It's why i do not communicate in the way you wish. For most PI's, that would be even more confusing

GLA

Oh. If there was not a high % confluence of the 5 key mathematical models, then you would not buy the raise. Those are the ones destined for drift down from nearly the start. But they have a way to profit highly from those. However it's capped profit. Tends to be 10-20%s . Sometimes it's just straight forward strategic optionality for assured lower future prices. And the odd time, got conned. Regardless, low % optionality not much good to us.

It is a scenario where you buy now (in case wrong on a raise imminent), and buy more if a raise at lower price.

Basically you follow and profit in the same model as the informed and creators of the situation. The last trick, is to know when to sell, or all that becomes worthless haha

GKA

The high confluence test isn't meant to be where they raise, it's meant to PROVE what the stock is worth, so they can raise at a "discount" that actually feels like great value. It's brilliant psychological pricing. they use mathematical confluence to establish credibility for higher valuations, then offer new investors a "smart entry" below those proven levels. An 8p raise after hitting 14p with 144% confluence creates a 43% discount narrative that drives institutional FOMO. New buyers think they're getting a massive bargain below "proven" levels, while the original institutions who accumulated at 11.2p during the 1110% confluence spike don't care because they're still profitable and have created maximum upside optionality for new participants. The 8p level has zero mathematical resistance, creating a clear path back to the 11.2p confluence anchor (40% upside) and eventually the 14p proven high (75% upside), which practically guarantees new investors will make money and ensures maximum demand for the raise. They're essentially using the confluence data as scientific proof of value, then pricing the raise to guarantee success for new buyers while maintaining their advantageous early position . it's sophisticated capital markets execution disguised as conservative pricing.

If a raise? 8p makes sense. Maybe 9.

The ignorant will say 'nuts'. The wide boys will say ' how the **** does he know all this?'

haha

Classic II positioning pre a raise you know. the higher price just discovering state of market prior. They are not looking /discovering a discount to a future raise price. They are looking at a discount to next level price. So, they discovered the discount at 11.25 was 20% to any lower raise price

This is why you often see a gathering pre raise, above the coming raise price. 1. looks more natural and 2. they already know their market discount.

This form of discount discovery is important. 20% not bad. If discount was 50%+, be an issue for SP performance for gerbils. As they can make too much on SP going nowhere. 20%, this will be the support of the raise follow up blag

40s coming

lol

Interesting to note what the models spat out in %, around time of dual listing?

SO, looks like this one is paying the xmas turkey

Most would have seen that period is a false move/breakout. But not this time. Yes , on normal %s. No, in this instance. Example if that breakout was around normal Inv shift, you would have shorted the higher price, most likely. If all other data aligned