Member Info for MrHumble

This is way way oversimplifying things. But at least it's easy to understand as a general concept.

https://x.com/YankTrain17909/status/1952003338343723162

Back to SBTX

There are many forms of analysis. Personally i don't knock any. Whatever works is always best method for each individual or firm imo

Research is a focus on the past to extrapolate forecasts and outlooks for the future. It is difficult to derive an opinion from nothing right? Something has shape it. Or if an IPO, then other markets are required to shape it. Now, we know it is impossible to be of bullish outlook here, if the foundation of that research is:

Past accounts

Last accounts

Massive Off radar v RNS content deviations.

The list goes on and on.

There is nothing here to set a foundation of bullishness - including performances of past launch dates example Axis down -78% , raising 4 million to put it on a shop shelf, despite it being a multi-year massive net loser (accounts adjusted for other things since v historic expenses)

So we have literally nothing to be positive about, to the present day

Got to seperate it then right? Look at the new product/ingredient and go to the regulators and credible funds etc?

Still not great at all.

But this is what little companies require for the profiteers in the underlying markets , to thrive

A separation. Reality put aside, and dreams brought to the fore

Sweet dreams gerbils

Rule 3. 'Organic growth is achieved through silence'. Sure platforms can advertise their service or whatever. But that's just temp cashflow creation on a monthly basis. Not long term growth. Nor is free advertising on BB's etc.

The best way to go about it is to never engage with the public. Never even let them know who they deal with. Believe me, even fund analysts will pay you, if there is a mystique rather than a known. Focus on the clients (in this case subscribers).If the quality is there, then you need no more. Self inflates.

And it saves 23.5 hours per day of trying to defend oneself. A pointless exercise online anyway

Let all of us make our ....

What i do find weird on AIM an Co.

If people are subscribing for views, why are they always at least summarised for free on BB's?

I see many subscription platforms out there. I don't think it's fair to have members paying, and then just give it all to us free anyway.

Let al of us make or errors imo. And if we ever want to get better, we can all simply pay as well

Now that others have finished glorifying themselves, how's the outlook here?

In a way its sort of a compliment.

'Mr Humble is equally as dim as a citibank analyst, a sector fund etf manager and the regulators in the UK,EU,US and China'

Well, at least if i treat all words the same as everyone else, that's how i conclude it anyway lol

Thanks

I personally do not mind being considered dim or lazy, or , in essence, at a total failure to understand anything. As old Jack used to say - 'if thoughts dont affect broker balances - who cares?'

However, we do have a slight issue in this instance. My views are derived from massive AUM's, regulators etc.

But tbf, if they are all dim, then it is only fair to say - i must be too. I can't argue against that.

But if they do they need to be protected. I think it's obvious what damage they would fear to reputations and such, with just one report in a UK little-cap. Possibly why it is rare? To make them mass produce, we need a clever strategy

Way above my head though. Maybe one day soon somebody will have come up with a way and we will suddenly see it all happening. Here's hoping

I don't think it will be very popular with little PLC's tbf. Shaping narrative must be only to a controlled audience category. Gerbils.

Everything we read and see is not really designed for mass distribution. It is for limited distribution, to optimise stock distribution. It's why you wont find many engaging with the free press etc. That would be dangerous. The audience may extend beyond Gerbilines, and and free press cant be told what to write. They would fear such research

Anyway, broadly speaking, I think free press needs to come to the UK little caps. I just dont know anyone smart enough to make it happen personally

I did not know that UK little-cap media outlets have to so many critics, they have to be categorised into various 'deranged clan levels' to make management of it all a bit easier. I assume the 10 derangement categories are based on post counts lol

But has anyone noticed how the best do it? They say nothing. Example Goldman Sachs release a report. It will have many critics. Response? Silence.

This is what you can do when content , facts and credibility are a given. Report - Silence - Next report. Everyone forgets the noise. Sachs know this. At the end of the day, when it comes to putting money down, you will always have a public Sachs report in the back of mind . Not much else

I was thinking, what if we had an international influx of 'reports and silence ' on UK little caps from the credible? I think it would be a good thing . At the end of each day, it is all that will stick in minds when looking at the buy button.

At least i think so. Anyone ever told to check in at Broadmoor for supporting a buy call? lol

It's important to understand AIM. Anyone refusing to pay all their salaries and returns via losses are normally deemed 'defective' , not 'affective'

Looks like net is going to sue anyone that made him buy 30,40,50,60p. Net i dont think telling you it's going to be a £1 soon, for years, is harassment.

I always find in the dark matrix mol, let a topic run for a bit, let people commit, and then drop the source bomb. its very affective.

SEA plays a huge role in markets. The L is forgotten by most, hence the SEA lol

Anyway imo opinion mol, whatever way you do things - just go straight to the source - regulators - funds - etc, But certainly not CEO's Tends to make things more clear. You will find they are extremely generous with the right approach.

Which is a bit sad after a company exists a few years re 10 or 12 basics, all under 0 lol

The amount of speeches i listen to about 'not understanding' fundamentals. lol. I understand them alright. how they are played. Reams of crud, and im just looking at a squiggle on a chart thinking 'enjoy that gerbil' haha

Point is though, there are about 10 key basics - and an instrument typically works to a constant 3 of those 10

However on loss making companies/little caps - the game adapts as all that stuff tends to be below zero

ANd its fun

It's amazing how fundamentalists cry about charts, yet it's the bread and butter of true fundamentals

Take 2 very simple basics. EPS fwd and earnings. Shorters laughing all day at buy callers

https://x.com/YankTrain17909/status/1951740211383198050