Member Info for MrHumble

Narrowed spread and not for buyers. Inviting gerbils

Bad

‘Big brand near financial ruin orders 500 buckets of worms. They said ‘we saw the presentation and clapped like trained chimps, in awe’

Well, one more

I don’t know exactly what would confirm no regulatory watch

Something like

‘Big royalties as expected ‘

I’d only be playing for a fast 50% to be fair

I’m going to buy some around 10p. But before I do, I need assurances that the company isn’t under regulatory watch. One ridiculous RNS would confirm it. Then wait the drop and prep for the big blaggy

Disappointing tbh

Easy RNS about ‘20 NDA orders’ (from a Beddit in Bulgaria’

Or even use a troubled big brand name for a fee

‘x brand orders minimum quantity amount for 3 years (amount undisclosed , 20 pence)

A million ways to ramp it without accountability

It’s why I think they are ‘on watch’

Was a good idea by O Hara though?

‘Well nobody is going to believe a word I say now so let’s spin out a few companies and get CEOs to be mini-me’ -it’s called de-risking the blags lol

Should have learned prior via O Hara

All imo of course. But I doubt anyone would bet against

I remember all the videos etc about Axis, launched world psoriasis day etc

But what does it say on the label?

That’s right

It sure as hell isn’t any of the guff spewed out prior to launch

And becomes the same as 5 billion other products

I’d bet any cheap product it’s added to for stock distribution purposes, won’t claim it at all in UK US EU or China. Just say ‘supports skin ‘

Very quite at Croda about regulation issues for clients usage of claims

Is that down to Croda or the client?

A Croda rep don’t seem sure re ‘might’ not be a regulations issue (so that also means ‘might be’)

This suggests it’s down to the client to find legal cover

More BT that brings in the sector money so why I think it’s important for vod

I see BT did the push hour on 212 . Not sure if a cleanse or not but at 213 mid, won’t be the case. All in on VOD

Time for me to retire from the thread. Technical stuff is a bit heavy and now really too much to do

GLA

Btw, I think it’s fine to trade all that

But I’d consider the real underlying business model and not the one they all require you to consider 🤓

As Vlad the Impaler used to say about AIM

‘It’s not growth they back…it’s an assured future distribution price that they pay for ‘

And that’s the deal. All the interest you lot have in growth? OPTI, the debt to equity bonds, etc etc …. None at all lol

This is true at any level of course. Not unique to AIM

What is unique, are the income extraction methods 😂

That’s a lot of incomes. A lot of dough. Cash doesn’t grow on trees despite sometimes forgetting digits on screens are raw cash

Somebody’ s got to pay ….

Everyone gets paid a derivative income. No exception bar? Gerbils

Think of anyone else? Income assured.