Member Info for mike1974

Fromage - Exactly, but I don't refer to them as Market Makers, I prefer to use the much more accurate term of Market Manipulators.

But according to some gullible and/or deluded people there is no Market manipulation... it's all entirely down to natural, legitimate and transparent Market forces, supply and demand etc.

lolz

Dark Knight - I'm glad you noticed all the insider sell offs as well... but of course its all just a big conspiracy that certain players have the ability to manipulate stock values up or down to benefit their particular position.

Well time will tell on this one soon enough and sort out who are the loony conspiraloons who are the naive and gullible compliant simpletons.

Marmion - Another one I see... can you show me where exactly the Richards Bay price or any other price of anything within the energy sector has been so volatile as to rise and fall back again by upto 8% or more repeatedly over the course of just 3-4 trading days during this last month, I'll wait....

Edward - Awww bless that's so sweet, you actually believe that this or any other stock can't be and isn't subject to manipulation by the big boys.

Such wide eyed innocence and child like naivety is truly a beautiful thing, you hold on to that for as long as you possibly can and stay away from the real world, it's a harsh and cruel place.

Another big rise in the last 2 trading days no doubt followed by an equally sharp fall in the next 2 days, the blatant manipulation with this stock is getting a bit tiresome now.

Source - There certainly seems to be some manipulation going on with this stock at the moment, it's up and back down again every couple of days like the proverbials undergarments.

More evidence of Asian countries performing a LNG-to-coal fuel switch, Thailand has reactivated two mothballed coal-fired units at the Mae Moh plant and brought them back online.

Well there's no sign so far that this conflict is going to have the same (positive) impact on this share price that the outbreak of war in Ukraine had, which seems a little odd given the effect on global energy supplies and markets has the potential to be at least as significant if not more so.

Yes sorry, I meant to say 400 million, still not a lot but a lot more than 4 million!

G7 releasing 4 million barrels oil might have something to do with it.

Hilarious how one of the most corrupt and self enriching political leaders Europe has ever known has the front to talk about fighting corporate corruption.

The only reason they are targeting FXPO is so he, he is cronies and his puppet masters can enrich themselves even more.

It will be interesting to see what DannyPost Ltd is worth in a year or two from now, I predict a fair bit more than the bargain price he got it for, mainly due to changes that had already been instigated and implemented in the business prior to him getting his hands on it.

Despite the initial confusion with random figures as to the value of my holding I'm pleased to report I've had the full amount including divi appear as available cash in my trading account.

I've just looked at mine and I'm now very confused and concerned...

I have 4050 IDS meaning an approximate value of £14,500 (dependent on whether you include the dividend or not)

However it's currently showing the value of my holding as the "book cost" of £7,400 with a "loss" of £8,200 or 93%!!!!

These figures are making no sense at all to me! Can someone explain them?

Why is it only showing thd value of my holding as being the "book cost" ie what I've paid for them, and not the gains I've made??

Sergio - You don't have a plan go invest in the company... so presumably you're shorting this stock and that's why you're pumping out endless doom and gloom and negative storys

Fresian - Why wouldn't Zhevago sell?

I can understand why he's somewhat reticent to simply hand it over to Zelensky and his crooked cronies but I don't see why he wouldn't sell for the right price?

What the F*** is going on with this sh*tty website? Why is only the first line of my posts appearing?

Not sure why only half my reply appeared, I'll try again...

I still doubt the reason for Morgan Stanley increasing their holding is for the measly

Newdealz - I still very much doubt Morgan Stanley have increased their holding purely for the measly

Newdealz - I can't agree with your take on that at all... Would the likes of Morgan Stanley really be prepared to tie up millions for a potential return of well below 0.5% even if it is 'guaranteed'?

I very much doubt they'd bother investing millions in order to get a five figure return... that wouldn't even cover their weekly lunch expenditure!