Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
busymomof3 . If your ICU friend became symptomatic 5 days after receiving the vaccine, it is likely that she had already contracted the virus, prior to vaccination, given the usual delay between contraction and symtomatology. Best wishes. miidas
BlackBat17 You may be aware of my most recent correspondence. With reference to your promotion of GBP, please give estimates of field size in P90, P50 and P10 estimates rather than just 'top end' Miidas
Thx. Like you, I am ever-hopeful of a highly-successful outcome. I am simply being realistic.
I have been overly- encouraged, in the past, of extremely optimistic P10 predictions!
Now, I want to moderate these predictions and be realistic in my expectations, hence P50 values should be my considerations.
That implies that you would be happy with a 10% possibility of drilling success achieving news sufficient to achieve o share price above 1p. Therefore a 90% chance of failure to achieve it! Odds are not appealing!
Why would you want to know a figure (P10) that there is only a 10% chance of achieving? Perhaps a P50, where there is an equal chance of achievement would be better! Add in the P90 which has a 90% chance of achievement to gain the full picture.
I have been a private investor in SOLO?SCIR for many years with the resultant disappointments. I am excited at the prospects of Helium1 IPO but have no experience in how to participate. I telephoned Peterhouse Capital ( as per the ATTIS OIL RNS ) for information and they advised me that they could not talk to me as an individual private investor but the approach would have to be made by a brokerage house, financial advisor etc. Any further advice from this board would be appreciated. Miidas
Bishop190 " I too think nuclear plays a part in future energy. I hope that will in future be fission not fusion though."
Please explain why you prefer fission with, all its explosive potential, rather than fusion. I understand that, whilst fusion is not fully evaluated and problems remain with its utilisation, it is likely to be far less dangerous.
Thx Miidas
"Algy Cluff has notified the Company that he has agreed to sell the 10,648,709 Ordinary Shares resulting from the exercise of such options to IPGL Limited, a company controlled by Michael Spencer, at a price of 3.5 pence per share."
RNS 13/02.2019
Thank you, Catchingpigeons
It potentially opens up tremendous opportunities..
Good luck. Miidas
Hopefully, they will be able to fast track both modes of administration. Miidas
I know that they can anticipate that they will be able to utilise their nebuliser to administer TZLS-501 directly into the affected lungs. The point I am making is that the nanoparticle technology may permit TZLS-501 to be injected safely and slowly intravenously, avoiding potential toxicity problems. This would permit two separate administration systems for differing patient circumstances. Miidas
Could it be that the most important aspect of the recent acquisition is the nanoparticle delivery technology, invented by Dr K.S. permitting safe, slow -release intravenous administration. If it could also be applicable to TZLS-501, it would give TILS two safe, rapid routes of administration. Then the added bonus of a potential COVID19 treatment in the form of Actinomycin. Miidas
I have been trying to independently validate the figures presented by the previous contributors and, before, presenting my own calculations, I should like to ask advice regarding the discount that should be apportioned to any potential purchaser.
Assuming a £30 profit per barrel of oil equivalent, what discount to this figure would a potential purchaser be likely to expect before considering an offer? Would it be 80%, 90%, 95%?
The field is contentious but has been appraised and problems regarding compartmentalisation have been reconciled. There is also the potential upside if deeper levels are confirmed to contain oil/gas and if the areal extent is increased.
I am a holder. Any guidance gratefully received. Miidas
Thank you Mcgee and adoubleuk, your considered opinions are appreciated.
As a non-engineer, I would have thought this information is very important in regard to future attempts to complete the locking procedure. Miidas
Joe Bass.
Far from being phuqing lazy, I did read today's RNS several times and have followed the progress of HUR minutely over the last 4.5 years since first investment! That includes daily reference to all bulletin board comments!
If it is possible for the 'rope' to fail despite being inspected after the 'snagging', it is not inconceivable that the buoy may have been damaged despite initial ROV visual inspection, hence my enquiry regarding its buoyancy and its likelihood to have avoided impact damage.
Thanks wellwell. Miidas
When the 'rope' broke, releasing the buoy, would the buoy have descended with such force that it impacted the seabed? Or would the designed buoyancy have prevented impact and minimised the risk of impact damage?
Thanks, Miidas
Excellent post, Phillo Miidas