Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plant. Watch the video here.
Yeah I agree. It's a nasty looking advert tbh.
They are late to the party and if anyone thinks that advertisement will "blow the roof off" or "we are off to the moon" they are out of their god damn mind.
Yes there Is. The data from South Africa show its extremely mild. Majority of hospitalisation there has been through people being admitted for other things and tested positive at hospital ( didn't know they had it, therefore being symptomless or extremely mild)
Pure propaganda pushing a specific vaccine. The real world data shows that its very mild and that most of the hospital admissions from omicron are coincidence (people being hospitalised from something else and being positive on admission).
It's an orchestrated hysteria to push vaccination and divide further.
This hysteria is just ludicrous.
I'll tell you what... if this goes to 50p next week or the week after I'll give you all my shares in this company. Absolutely mad statement that.
If you look at the real world data from South Africa you can see infection is through the roof but most importantly deaths have had such a small rise it's nearly negligible. Hospitalisation isn't any higher and infact the virus was only detected by people that where arriving for other things and when tested it turned out to be positive. So yes, lots of community transmission but realistically nothing to be too concerned about. The knee jerk reaction is ludicrous and as SA are probably 5 or 6 weeks ahead we can see that it's not deadly at all.
I think if the government lockdown then they will claim that the low hospitalisation and deaths was due to their lockdown rather than just the natural course of the virus.
People need to calm down about this variant or should I say scariant.
Long live SNG
It's standard practice to avoid any illegality.
If they announce anything at the meeting/webinar/conference and it is public domain then they have covered their back. I've been invested in some pharma/research companies that do the same and the rns just has the normal fluctuations of daily trading.
ABSOLUTELY nothing of concern and standard practice. Calm down folks
The problem now is that we don’t have the security of results landing “anytime now”.
So instead of people holding tight incase news lands, they might decide to sell and buy later because we know results a a way away yet.
This will slide another bit before the tide turns. Could see 110s.
Holding till results or further.
I think we will get no significant news. I think it will be a generic update to appease frustrated shareholders.
I just can’t see anything that will have a big impact on sp being discussed at a q and a. Unless there’s a RNS in the morning and will discuss it in detail later. Looking forward to it none the less.
I would argue that natural immunity is better than vaccine induced immunity. And those carry on that somehow if a person isn’t vaccinated it’s putting other people at risk I find a little fabricated.
I think the statistics show that the vaccine reduces illness but if you look at Israel, I think it proves that the vaccine does nothing for transmission. Blaming unvaccinated is a scape goat for the vaccine which isn’t as effective as people believed or hoped.
Yes I totally agree with that statement that the FDA full approval of the vaccine will allow More wriggle room for other treatments. This was never going to be approved until vaccines where administered and had approval. I wish I’d have had more conviction about this in the past year because I’d have been more inclined to buy heavily in the large drops. However I’m happy to wait until we get the news we have been waiting for (seems like an eternity)
Just want to hear what people think and shed some light on EUA for vaccines and SNG.
Personally I think SNG has been suppressed as a useful drug for Covid to ensure Vaccine uptake was high and line the pockets of pharma.
I also read that the vaccines could achieve EUA because there was no medical treatment for Covid. I just wondered if anyone knew that if a medical treatment becomes available would it stop the EUA for the vaccines? I’m obviously not sure if it would but I’ve been thinking it could Be a possibility.
It could explain why it’s been very difficult for SNG. I feel we will have a long wait unfortunately. I think we will have to wait until worldwide vaccination levels are 70 to 80% before we get where we all want to go. Once it’s at that I think we might start to see smaller companies get a slice of the pie.
This article might actually be one of the 1st bbc articles that I’ve seen about covid that isn’t total propaganda.
It gave a fair balanced view on mask wearing and that the its effectiveness is inconclusive because it’s hard to distinguish the exact impact it has.
I wasn’t debating the validity of the long covid article. I am just of the opinion that an apparent non biased broadcaster is total biased and has been in too many unforgivable scandals to be Called a great organisation never mind the greatest.
DOC I’m afraid a great organisation would not have protected a peadophile for years and arguably gave him the opportunity to prey on youngsters.
They are a disgrace and they certainly are very biased which they shouldn’t be.
Can I just say Woodstock that someone refusing the c19 jab doesn’t necessarily mean they are antivax.
Speaking for myself, I will not be taking this vaccine for my own reasons. I’ve had all my vaccines to This point and so have all my children. Refusing one makes me antivax?
I find this narrative deplorable.
Yes some people refusing this jab will be antivax but there’s many people just making their own informed choice.
Imagine your wife having an affair and then learning that’s it was with someone as repulsive as Matt Han****.
I feel for that man.
Han****s been promoting double jabbing way too literally.
Another day and another example of total hypocrisy and contempt..
It’s not about convincing people to believe me, I was giving a suggestion as to why Woodstock would be confused.
I ask the question why SAGE has to have behavioural psychologists on board?
COuld it be to help devise a plan for politicians into how to manage how people behave during this?
One way of doing so is to confuse and scare people, there is no debate on whether this is a tried and tested method.