Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
No. If it was likely, it would be in testing right now.
Is it?
Mik, Your confusion is based on the term "shares outstanding".
It's not what the MMs have to sell , it's this:
"Shares outstanding are all the shares of a corporation that have been authorized, issued and purchased by investors and are held by them" ... hence market cap = 149m x shareprice
Please don't double down and sound even more confused.
That's your decision and not one I would recommend
Who cares if it drops a bit?
Unless you went all in as opposed to a risk vs reward play just chill out.
I do worry about the number of times I read about people investing so much in 1 share and then being seriously underwater.
Please don't do that.
I agree in a mature market, but in a startup, sales is key otherwise the shareprice is at risk of P&D.
Claire, I'm glad sales aren't relevant to you.
Takes the pressure off waiting for the RNSs I guess.
If a rise in the shareprice was always linked to sales then the entire concept of pump and dump would not exist.
Sadly, it's all too common.
To be devil's advocate, the share options are linked to shareprice, not sales. So if this got pumped, the directors could cash in at a profit. Options linked to revenue would be a better signal to shareholders.
For the really big businesses with many employees it's been judged a bad idea by those businesses.
Risk assessment alone says offices can hold ~ 30% capacity and the cost / disruption of sending people back home is not to be underestimated.
Yes , they need £15K and the other guy doesn't want to put his hand in his pocket.
And exercised, which means a dilution
This share isn't on the list of shorted shares, so incorrect
@DG ... that's not the same authentication pattern needed for a global rollout is it?
And that's what the cheerleaders are hoping for.
@fact ha ha ... glad to have amused you. DK is a firm favourite of mine :)
Hope business is going ok in these difficult times.
ATB
Totally agree, but behind the scenes the viability is driven by the reality.
No one is doubting the intent is a good idea, but practically, work through some use cases:
* I flash my phone at you and present a photo and one time QR ...
* What do you do ? How are my details verified?
We've all been guilty of building and over-extending POC's early in our careers I'm sure, and there's nothing wrong with that. But right here, right now, that ambition is resulting in people investing their hard earned money, and for some already losing it ... so we need facts, not "Global potential !"
Hope that makes sense
He doesn't interact ... I'm happy to have a sensible conversation.
And re: your point that depends on whether this outfit are starting again or building their own which is unclear.
Sharebel, it's not personal but I won't be interacting with you. Google "Dunning-Kruger"
Sharebel's back ! yay!
Questions ready chaps ...
Sharebel will be back soon. I'm sure he will have all the answers.
Fact - we are in agreement, however their website hits you with this "SEQUESTRUM
Bringing Blockchain to the Real World" ....
Blockchain is already in the real world, and a major challenge is the development deployment of Dapps built upon (for example) ethereum.
I remain sceptical that they've resolved the technical challenges others have failed to.
That's my position as opposed to "deramping"