Member Info for MickyBee

So question Heid's inaccurate claims?

Firstly she doesn't know how much the company is making , nothing released of late to collaborate this, and second has she forgotten the shareholders? its not uncle dave's company

heid moving the goalposts again , so which year is it now???

Heid , David making loads of money , thought shareholders owned the company , unless you are MF that thinks 65% is held by institutions

No MF , just people who post things that are way out of their depth , simple question , who are the institutions that own 65% of UJO ?????

MF , correct on what? you have no idea what nominee accounts are , you still believe that 65% of shares are held by institutions , and finally you are unable to quote who these institutions are , definitely a 101 call , a village has lost one , otherwise please answer , because if you don't lets see who looks the fool .

Looks like the big institutions are off loading again , we have dropped , any ideas who they are??

RNS , thats what I said

RNS , you are wasting your time , he posts again I am ringing 101 , concern for welfare

MF2017 stop ramping and posting crap links , try reading legitimate ones , UJOs are a good start

post facts links

Its not semantics , its more about people making up things , and believing in fairies at the bottom of the Christmas tree . Myself and several others have explained to you the facts . But as always keep coming back with unsubstantiated rubbish . Show me who these fictitious 65% institutional investors are ??

Institutes are not private investors , sorry have you lost the plot . As you keep saying they are involved?

Who are they??????

Not on UJOs official site , therefore holding will be less than 3% , so could be 1 share or several million

Actually agree with you for once , sadly MF isn't helping your cause

mf , WHAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

1.You keep quoting an Australian company for your facts

2 . You seem to dispute UJOs own site

3 , Nominee accounts seems too difficult to understand

4. Its TR1s not tier , if anyone goes over or under 3% holding they have to declare , plus other thresholds (won't bored you with them)

5. How do you know no institutional investors have dumper their shares , if they hold <3% they don't have to

No wonder you are open to abuse , haven't got a clue , and many people on here have explained in detail , but you still harp on about it

No just repetitive so far

Posting the same thing twice now?

JustBe exactly ,

If I remember the last TR1s were from Chris Oils sales

Justbe , thankyou