Member Info for Metooooo

So again, if FN know they will lose with say BHP, why would they play this game with Solg unless they have a binding clause giving them certain rights in all scenarios.

Can be read in both ways but hoping it is positive.

So no major announcement before the presentation.

Wow. 21 years since incorporation. Can someone psy 40p for everything and let us turn the page?

Why Managem would need sound for solar projects?

They only need them for the drilling stuff.

What

Don't ignore the possibility that managem could buy whether is remaining from sound. Gl becomes an advisor, if need be, Argent and the finance guy would join msnagem...

Just hoping PIs interests are not collateral damage.

Yep, very smart and fast.

John Argent on his linkedin about his role

at Sound energy!

"Additionally, responsible for subsurface evaluations of the Company’s business development activity in Africa, Europe and the Middle East."

Those who have averaged down (hopefully good for them) might get 3_4p if the drills are good.

30 millions is not a small stuff if it has to be repaid in, is it November?

Why

Now that we are not operators, are 17-20% shareholders, who you we need to keep the same directors..etc...

Any drilling planned in the next 6 months,? Tnx.

Guys, how old are you? Some respect for your age.

RED brings to this BB information and insights whether wrong or right. Many others clog this BB with insults, arrogance, childish arguments...

Managem are a mining firm. Nothing to do with gas. So why getting involved? May be they were told something cause they are very close to Onhym. Those pressure follow up could have given some good signals!

They know something.

Mathersfinger.

It was a post I copied from Advfn. While I'm not an expert, in some ideal cases (bids competition, government support..) and in view of the potential of the whole portfolio, those numbers shouldn't be impossible. Just hoping.

From Advfn on the 100p.

"over 100p. Don't make everyone laugh. That would make the market cap $3bn and almost the Cascabel $3.2bn NPV. The NPV is only achievable if $1.55bn is spent beforehand by its owner. (Actually $1.7bn in the first five years beforer cashflow turns positive) So anyone paying $3bn for cascabel has to spend another $1.7bn initially to get $4.75bn in return over the next 25 years ($1.7bn back over the next three years - 8yrs after start). Maybe the numpties on LSE would."