RE: naked shorting13 Aug 2018 10:58
brain fog descended over me reading that lot, at best discombobulating.
As usej, (to coin a phrase) l side with Bannor, although no longer known as my sibling, we may live on the same street, after all, l did see a neighbour working in his garden on Saturday.
Should we have a placing, 'shudders,' my estimations of the sp are lower than Bannors. From past experiences, the Pi will then start to cry out, belatedly, ' why couldn't we have taken part in the placing ', mates rates ', or wat-evar!
l always find Bannor always puts over a precise well-articulated article. ' Good on yer Bannor. '
In the past, I've prevented big loses from my PF by listening to ' doom-mongers ' rather then ' cheerleaders '. Not saying who is right, ob's or Bannor ' who l find pragmatic '., we just don't know...yet.
ob's, l find, well, as said, his rosy picture of the Bod discombobulating, too many nudge nudge, wink wink, taps side of nose for me. This weekend, particularly so.
Eventually he answered both Bannor's and post FH's, he still didn't answer mine about him ever writing to the Bod to clarify, not the first time he's ignored my questions, maybe I'm on his filter list...at least he's doing something right.
Of the BoD itself and its capabilities Kafkaesque.
Have a happy day folks