RE: Talking23 May 2019 22:57
That's the second time you've accused me of answering for Eric. l won't say you're right,
but l will say you're wrong.
The first time you accused me of answering for him, l had asked you a question, don't know much about grammar myself, but l do know the difference between a question or an answer.
Now that l've told you, here is the, question, question again, will someone list all of Etr's aliases? You must have thought l was asking you, paranoia?
You skirted it very well last time.
We could scroll back between us and double check the whole thread if you like. Crikes, l mean, you did do well to go all the way back to March 2nd 2017. 2017, f-me really?
What was it you said l posted?
" “l filtered everybody ages ago... like listening to the sound of my own voice. Next step to stop looking in on LSE.” "
Yep l did, clearly, piss-taking is lost on you.
But you trumped that, by your research on etr by going back to February 2017, F, F, F really? How long have you been here?
This time you say thanks for answering for Etr, again. Well, you're not right, but you are wrong again. Two out of two is not bad.
There's no answer there, is there? Opinions and thoughts expressed, but no answers
You said " Don’t confuse genuine comments of care "
You're not fooling anybody other than yourself with what you were implying, .
You didn't see the repugnant message within your original post then and still don't, wretched.
Now l will speak for ETR, he can always correct me if l'm wrong. Big C and little c was a reference to someone called couts, ever heard of him?
As you don't understand ( yet had two years to fathom out) my micky taking, there's not really any chance you will ever understand etr.
" I am confused very much. " Yes, l agree, you are.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
