Member Info for MarkSidley

I may be deficient in vitamin d and obese, but I am not a chump. I've been accurate many occasions previously, and I'm correct again. 50p. You watch.

50p

Vast making profit. Huge upside here. 50P in 2022. So cheap and lucky for anyone to get in at these levels.

Yeah, 50k is not that much, but it's definitely worth investing in; I'll be topping up soon as well.

Before January 16th Folks!

Makes me ill when people say that about when I post. I have nothing to do with that dumb s**s

Can see this rocketing forward to huge numbers

Haha antharry, legend.

If there is misconduct, which I seriously doubt, it should be investigated by the FCA, who have no reason to believe there is, which is why they are not doing so, not by someone who knows how to make a website on Godaddy.

But it costs every year to keep them running, how is that in the shareholder's interest? Anybody can find a similar website name if they want to, the fact that they have found .co.uk is irrelevant, if it was not that, it would have been another variation. The real website is vastplc.com anything other than that is a fake, it is that simple. It is the equivalent of someone carrying out something similar on social media. The website is not meant to be a clone of the original, but given its domain name, it is evidently intended to try and get people to find it easily. It falls into a defamation case. It is trying to damage the companies image through its agenda.

But what would be the purpose? Also given that the companies domain name is vastplc.com, why would it create every variation under the sun? the proposed could have just created vastresourcesplc.co.uk or vastresourcesplc.com or vast-plc.com.

But the company has .com because it is a company operating outside of the UK and not solely in the UK hence why it does not require the .co.uk extension. Also, if the .co.uk was taken, the person who created the website would have just used another domain extension anyway.

There are over 280 different website domain extensions to choose from. The average annual cost of each domain with hosting is £80. Calculate the cost of securing all of the domains and you'll see that it'll cost Vast over £224,000 over ten years. Just for domains, I doubt it would be appealing to investors. So, I disagree that it is unprofessional.

if that domain was not available they could have got another one such as .co, there are hundreds to choose from

The domain thing isn't unprofessional really, no business rarely gets ever domain under the sun related to the term, there is lots of domain choices such as .uk or .co or .io , their legal team could probably get it removed though as it conflicting with their brand, I heard a story about someone who purchased a domain such as facebooook.com and they had to get it removed because its closeness to the original company.

Hardly a big deal, even Elon Musk makes errors like that times

As soon as that diamond deal drops watch it fire upwards

We've confirmed that you don't possess any Vast Resources stock. Is it reasonable to assume that your everyday efforts to decrease the mood of VAST are an attempt to enable you to invest at a lower price? Or are you a bitter ex-employee with a plan to pull the company down? Other than the fact that you are an insider with information that would be illegal to discuss on the LSE board, I don't see any other plausible rationale for your posting history within this board.

Mr.Bob, are you a disgruntled ex-employee with a sour taste in your mouth?

Mr.Bob. I believe your position is summed up by the promptness with which you opened your account. What would your agenda be otherwise?