Member Info for mac4671

Brookkers, you simply come with attempts and arguments while providing nothing to back up what you say.

It is all in RNS, i can't help that, they have provided us all with the relevant information over time. The comprehension part is far from patronising, that's just what you have to do, put all of the provided info together and comprehend what they have told all of us.

GLA

Do we know of any general meetings approaching, anyone? Yes, that's right. i believe we do don't we!

"Such a disposal would require shareholders' consent, an announcement which contains the information set out in Schedule Four to the AIM Rules; and be accompanied by a circular containing the details of the disposal and convening a general meeting to approve it."

The timing of his appointment could very much point to something possibly looking to be wrapped up for the incoming general meeting. Now hey, no crying, it's just a theory based on the timing of his recent position, we are towards the end of May after all!

GLA

It is all structured to follow the Aim rules, particularly this one -

Engagement with CITIC and VTB Capital
Thu, 24th Oct 2019 09:53

"If the Company was to dispose of both of its Assets, then AIM Rule 15 (Fundamental Changes of Business) would apply. Such a disposal would require shareholders' consent, an announcement which contains the information set out in Schedule Four to the AIM Rules; and be accompanied by a circular containing the details of the disposal and convening a general meeting to approve it."

The entire thing is being structured to suit the Aim rules which the have to adhere to.

GLA

For Eurasia v.2.0 Brookkers, yes. But, we are not at Eurasia v.2.0 yet are we, we have to have a fundamental change of business to role in to once the significant assets disposal takes place. It is all in black and white in RNS tbh, you merely have to comprehend it.

INED at this stage is to finalise the asset sales, his role will undoubtedly change once we roll in to Eurasia v.2.0 and the Green hydrogen and Ammonia begins.

GLA

One of my favourite parts from the latest RNS drop is this -

"· He is PhD and CIMA (UK) qualified, with strong appreciation of Corporate Governance and diversity skills obtained through various assignments" QUALIFIED, not like the green box lot! There's a massive difference between sides one thinks! :

"· Artem Matyushok served in senior M&A roles with major Natural Resource companies: total value of M&A deals executed is over $100bn

· Mr. Matyushok has 20 years' experience in Energy & Natural Resources

· He is PhD and CIMA (UK) qualified, with strong appreciation of Corporate Governance and diversity skills obtained through various assignments

· Mr. Matyushok is a former Shell alumnus, where he participated in several development projects and later was involved in Shell's incipient Energy transition initiative including hydrogen and ammonia"

Ah, sunshine, it's certainly lovely!

GLA

Such an easy waiting game, all of the M&A experts taking care of things as we bask in the sun -

An iNED is an individual who is a director (member) of the board of directors who does not have a material or pecuniary relationship with the company or related persons. The iNEDS's role is to provide independent oversight and constructive challenge to the executive directors

https://www.aon.com/unitedkingdom/insights/a-guide-for-independent-non-executive-directors.jsp

It's very easy to understand his recent appointment!

GLA

Do enjoy the M&A facts to feast on at the M&A banquet.

There are those who know, then, there are those who pretend to know. If you know then you can always provide the third party verification link which provides the official information for anyone to read themselves. After that, well, it's just a simple game of comprehension.

Do have a lovely afternoon genuine shareholders, she's a fine day outside!

GLA

Now i've done a little look over my shoulder, and, well, all i can see is Artem now helping them achieve the best possible deal for all genuine shareholders -

Artem Matyushok
Head of M&A and Business Development, Rosneft

"Artem Matyushok is Global Head of M&A at Rosneft leading them through $40Bn of M&A deal flow in 2016. He was previous a Manager of M&A in Treasury & Corporate Finance Division of Shell. He then moved to become Director of M&A at TNK-BP, before moving to Rosneft where he was first Head of New Business Development and Joint Venture Creation before moving to become Global Head of M&A."

https://energycouncil.com/event-speakers/artem-matyushok/

UBS, DLA Piper, Dmitry (ex investment banker who has done numerous deals previously), and now Artem . . . . . all top level experts in M&A.

Experts vs Green boxes, the choice is very easy imho

GLA

Oh, and rightly noted by other genuine shareholders, potential has been completely dropped from the statement, so, it's game on! Aimho

GLA

The title of this thread is all that matters to real shareholders, anything else is nonsense at this stage. It, yet again, has been confirmed in RNS that the Russian assets sale process is still very much going strong.

There's been doom and gloom spinners, volatility spinners etc etc. All nonsense, the deal/s is progressing all fine, that is what the latest RNS tells every single genuine shareholder.

GLA

DUTY BOUND TO GET THE BEST DEAL FOR ALL SHAREHOLDERS:

It's this part here -

"Provided that any conflicted directors declare their interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement, the relevant transaction or arrangement is not liable to be set aside. However, in circumstances in which directors have actual or potential conflicts of interest, the company may wish to consider appointing a committee of disinterested directors to ensure that the process of negotiating and approving the transaction and the terms of the transaction documents is robust

The directors must also consider their other statutory duties: the two most relevant duties when approving a company’s entry into an M&A transaction are the duty to exercise independent judgement and the duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence"

https://www.financierworldwide.com/board-role-in-ma-transactions-practical-implications-of-directors-duties#.YoV8_WnTU0E

It's literally just around the corner imho. It's all to do with the best interests of ALL shareholders!

They complete these by having him run over things, question and push them to ensure the best possible deal has been done for all shareholders. He may pick up on one or two things which may get altered for the final paperwork, or, because Dmitry has been at the helm, he may not, and simply act a third party verification set of eyes confirming that it is all good to go as the best possible M&A for all shareholders -

"The directors must also consider their other statutory duties: the two most relevant duties when approving a company’s entry into an M&A transaction are the duty to exercise independent judgement and the duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence"

They're duty bound to ensure that it is indeed the best possible M&A that they can achieve for all of us!

GLA

Indeed Stonk, it's a very bizarre piece to add to his post, almost like trying to convince people to open shorts to gain divis, very strange tbh!

GLA

That is all, the end approaches. The green boxes have lost, they know that they have and are simply very desperate to close their shorts on the cheap.

GLA

Cracking spots CAW, Eurasia will get it all as it all falls within the exclusivity area.

I believe the Monument is for the 'Great Statue Of Mac', being erected in dedication of years spent back handing green box bots . . . . . that will get them biting lol

GLA

It's this part here -

"Provided that any conflicted directors declare their interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement, the relevant transaction or arrangement is not liable to be set aside. However, in circumstances in which directors have actual or potential conflicts of interest, the company may wish to consider appointing a committee of disinterested directors to ensure that the process of negotiating and approving the transaction and the terms of the transaction documents is robust

The directors must also consider their other statutory duties: the two most relevant duties when approving a company’s entry into an M&A transaction are the duty to exercise independent judgement and the duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence"

https://www.financierworldwide.com/board-role-in-ma-transactions-practical-implications-of-directors-duties#.YoV8_WnTU0E

It's literally just around the corner imho. It's all to do with the best interests of ALL shareholders!

They complete these by having him run over things, question and push them to ensure the best possible deal has been done for all shareholders. He may pick up on one or two things which may get altered for the final paperwork, or, because Dmitry has been at the helm, he may not, and simply act a third party verification set of eyes confirming that it is all good to go as the best possible M&A for all shareholders -

"The directors must also consider their other statutory duties: the two most relevant duties when approving a company’s entry into an M&A transaction are the duty to exercise independent judgement and the duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence"

They're duty bound to ensure that it is indeed the best possible M&A that they can achieve for all of us!

GLA

You don't have to take it from me, all info is out there.....stage 8 since Oct -

https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/deals/mergers-acquisitions-ma-process/

It has always just been a question of how long for the paperwork to be done from that point tbh.

GLA

Indeed bori, due diligence was completed in Oct, there is only one thing that they've been working on since, that paperwork. Any merger and acquisition chart will show you that.

That is how he does it from the independent NED position. It speeds up arriving at the independent judgement etc, the final stages of paperwork and decisions.

GLA

That's how he speeds it up from his current role as an independent non executive director, you need to understand the role to understand why he has been placed there.

GLA

I believe that it could be done for the AGM. The appointment of Artem looks like they have an almost final paperwork done, his current role will be to scrutinise it all, push and question things, which, leads to the final independent judgement etc and last minute paperwork alterations -

"Provided that any conflicted directors declare their interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement, the relevant transaction or arrangement is not liable to be set aside. However, in circumstances in which directors have actual or potential conflicts of interest, the company may wish to consider appointing a committee of disinterested directors to ensure that the process of negotiating and approving the transaction and the terms of the transaction documents is robust

The directors must also consider their other statutory duties: the two most relevant duties when approving a company’s entry into an M&A transaction are the duty to exercise independent judgement and the duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence"

https://www.financierworldwide.com/board-role-in-ma-transactions-practical-implications-of-directors-duties#.YoV8_WnTU0E

It's literally just around the corner imho. It's all to do with the best interests of ALL shareholders!

GLA

The thread of where the actual relevant information is.

You only have to read the info to understand his recent appointment.

Tick tock, tick tock.....

GLA