I will not be at the AGM as it's the busiest time of the year for me. I read the posts and note the mutual dissatisfaction with Parker. Also the lack of publicity from sar even though the results of the testing of our drugs are very good. I am quite happy to go with the consensus opinion here as i agree with what is being said but shouldn't we establish common ground on any approach at the AGM? As stated I will not be there but I can still ,as a shareholder, express my opinion/vote via post/email. Posting how we feel on this site and possibly our course of action will obviously enable the board to have their answers ready before the question is asked!
It's relatively easy to get hydrogen from water. The problem is the energy required is greater than the energy in the released hydrogen. Develop a way of doing it cheaply and you'll be a richer man than bill gates with a Nobel prize thrown in as well.
Im with you on this thoth. Doesn't seem to make sense ,reading between the lines. , all these shenanigans. Between Gilead and sierra. Somethings up. Don't know what but siera and Gilead seem to be very chummy for a reason
Having 23 potential targets for TYK2 as set out in patent application surely derisks TYK2 hugely. Having a 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 success rate against these targets surely would give us a substantial market ?
If the institution that bought on thé last raise was told about the content of the patent application then that would have been preferential information denied to us
Hi aber I did a horse the 12 times it ran,his name was notinwilly. Needless to say, he didn't come anywhere. Boom! boom! The old ones are the best ! Right, where's my scrumpy gone...