Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
I think we are moving into it now, make your minds up :-)(
Appears on your radar Polinvest? Did you sell your holding? OK if you did but thought you had a couple of million.
I think you are probably right Tamer, I have posted a chart , the boxes are support and resistance and hopefully speak for themselves . https://twitter.com/luckyorange1812/status/1487026100370878464
https://twitter.com/AIMHIGHER19/status/1486307097126088706
Thanks for the message. Will speak with David and Adam. Cheers
Thanks for highlighting it max , slightly disconcerting if he hasn't done his DD on that one before accepting the role?
Don't start with the beam us up Scotty stuff , but maybe that is the solution !
They have been drilling right through PAUL , the issue is that they are not reporting all of the findings .
Not having heard from Rod for a long time I was wondering if there was a fall out max as Adam was suddenly signing them off. It has made me wonder if Rod has claimed them as his own as it was him who handed the licence to ECR , for me that was compounded by their slow reaction to renew the licence , which again was an unnecessary oversight by them and annoyed the hell out of me .
Call it conspiracy theory or whatever you like but they are hiding something and performing poorly in managing the situation , even if there was an NDA you can bet that would have been announced that they are in discussion so I assume they are not and it would just be grasping at straws.
They need to up their game quicksmart but it is unlikely and desperately needs an Executive Director to steer the ship , i.e. someone with responsibility to report the facts.
Annoying part for me is that there are now 4 NEDs and not one of them is responsible for the running of the company (not their job) but to advise the Executive Director on various issues and they ain't got one i.e. none of them are to blame for not reporting the assays . Adam assesses them and signs them off but what next ?
Well hopefully the new NED Andrew Scott will spend a couple of weeks getting up to speed and finding out the things that they won't tell us and then start to up the ante on the marketing , it is his first role as a NED so hopefully he will pull the stops out . Does bug me that he will be taking money out of the company and getting paid for his other role in the media as a fee off ECR .... two bites of the cherry !
However with all NEDs there role in a company is only secondary to their other employment / interests.
I am now thoroughly ****ed off with the holding back of the core results , good or bad I want to know the reason behind not informing shareholders , it is dodgy practice .
I would think so Magoo , shouldn't need Brand any more . It is a good move and he will be looking for marketing information I'm sure . Was expecting some core results but note the 2.2 and 3.75 pop up again.
Who is leading the company , ? Adam is doing everything he can , the Chairman lied when he said that they can be contacted , no emails answered in any way , someone on here mentioned the licence running out and they needed to apply early , they didn't and it is rudderless at the moment the focus has gone!
It will come back when someone comes in to pull it all together but until then it is a waiting game.
The other question in my mind is , what happened to Rod ? Not heard of him from about the same time as the assays were due!
Price sensitive is whatever the broker decides but as broker they should be advising the company , usually they require any company to issue bad news immediately and are happy for any RNS to have a negative tilt but usually get the editing pen out if any company is trying to be positive .
Anyone's guess wtf is going on except those in the know.
I was told , rule of thumb , that if something is price sensitive then it requires an RNS , broker decides but they can hold it back whilst asking for corrections on the RNS write up.
I have no idea if there is anything price sensitive about the Creswick assays and anything we say is speculation . Keeping shareholders totally in the dark whatever the case is does a lot of damage to the sp as it erodes trust in the company .
There is a reason that AIM is called the 'wild west' of investing , there are very few rules and if those with money choose to ignore them they do!
Adam is due to report on those core results that increased his understanding on the Bailieston prospect (ahaa finger in the air moment) , procrastination seems to be the name of the game with ecr at the moment and shows why a ceo is always needed (whether you like them or not ) to drive the company forward .
There will be a resource at Bailieston (size of which unknown at the moment) .
Disappointed that they don't acknowledge emails is an understatement , it only takes a minute or two.
What the feck gives him the confidence to keep buying , it is not an amount of money you would risk without having a deep knowledge of the company , he is very confident or just plain stupid , I will go with the former .
https://www.branduk.net/ecr-ecr-minerals-holdings-in-company/ Never on LSE , no idea why that is ?
NOTIFICATION OF MAJOR HOLDINGS (to be sent to the relevant issuer and to the FCA in Microsoft Word format if possible)i
1a. Identity of the issuer or the underlying issuer of existing shares to which voting rights are attached ii :
ECR Minerals Plc
1b. Please indicate if the issuer is a non-UK issuer (please mark with an “X” if appropriate)
Non-UK issuer
2. Reason for the notification (please mark the appropriate box or boxes with an “X”)
An acquisition or disposal of voting rights
X
An acquisition or disposal of financial instruments
An event changing the breakdown of voting rights
Other (please specify)iii:
3. Details of person subject to the notification obligation iv
Name
Colin Braidwood
City and country of registered office (if applicable)
4. Full name of shareholder(s) (if different from 3.)v
Name
Colin Braidwood
City and country of registered office (if applicable)
5. Date on which the threshold was crossed or reached vi :
11/01/2022
6. Date on which issuer notified (DD/MM/YYYY):
11/01/2022
7. Total positions of person(s) subject to the notification obligation
% of voting rights attached to shares (total of 8. A)
% of voting rights through financial instruments
(total of 8.B 1 + 8.B 2)
Total of both in % (8.A + 8.B)
Total number of voting rights of issuervii
Resulting situation on the date on which threshold was crossed or reached
8.00%
N/A
8.00%
1,018,058,551
Position of previous notification (if
applicable)
7.02%
N/A
7.02%
1,018,058,551
Not 'completing application' AG , competing application , specsavers? ;-)
RR is on the interactive dashboard same date as the others , I do expect ECR to be in with a better than average chance although I see 6713 as more important to get done and dusted.
I have wondered whether there was a fallout with Rod Tamer, heard nothing of him since the results on Creswick were due back in mid last year?
That is speculation of course but what else are we to do if the company won't give the information?
or are they still being ignorant twats ?
You fare off on a tangent max , there are 4 applicants , Red Rock 7540 , Mercator (ECR ) 7537, Balmaine 7533 and Loddon Gold 7538 ..... https://earthresources.vic.gov.au/licensing-approvals/location-of-licences/licences-near-me#lat=-37.555466107142905&lng=143.8460152518101... box on the left gives you all of those details in the link . RR the only one with no accepted date.
I assume each one is numbered at the point of being opened on the day they arrived (all on the same day in this case) , hence the numbering system allocation .