Member Info for Lookin4Loot

Again SP goes down on more buys than sells.
or if any one got any diff data, then please say so.

If the SFO want something worth while to do,
then they investigate thee,s city traders, and stop them from trading till their investigations have been done, say 4 years, as that will cover lots of dodgy deals.

no way SP in this company nor others can drop so much with buys outselling sells for last few days
to me, they all in same boat, help the big fish out, and fry the little ones.

ello Ladds. yes as far as i know got them,
I copied what it said on the PFC instructions, 55,000.00 shares
IIs system would,nt take it,
then typed 55,000, same again
then 55000, again, would,nt take it.

it did take it, but my end wer,nt showing as no LooT had been taken
thats why i was paniky, as LooT did,nt clear till 7.45 last night

good job there was an international trader still there, up to 9.30. He checked and sorted it.

all because IQ, and Link would not ET the sales into my account, either at BS or II
so they sent cheques, 5 day wait for thee,s to come thru, and then get cleared.

and, for any one think,n of use,n EQ { now part of II } or Link, then forget about it,
over 1/2 hour to sell a share,,
name, address, D.O.B , NI number, memorable name, and some other crap.
then when one gets to end, it says cant sell, need to use an operative.
but doing this has cost me over 400£ of LooT in fees,
total rip off artists

So now sit back and enjoy the ride,
just hope a Divi comes thru, as it be a nice little earner.

Sorted, got thru to a late night trader, they did it from their end.
pheww, a relief. panic over

trying to get the shares thru with II
but it keeps saying not a correct figure.

tried both, and both saying incorrect figure, see below

Entitlement
55,000.00
Latest Response Date
23:59 08/11/2021
Option
Allocation
Do Nothing (Default)
Exercise Subscription Shares

any one with II had this

If the SFO had any balls, they investigate HM Government,
there loads of nefarious goings on over the years,

so much so, the DTI and Customs were into a fight over somem
what a farce that was
want a good read, look into the BAE and saudi corruption scandal

there seems to be 2 rules, one for gov and one for others.
and others never win

Unless some of you lads know different. for over a week, buys have vastly outnumbered sells,
but sp gone down
one day last week. dropped 3p on 2 million more sells then buys,
even the ut was showing higher
next day, it went down again

to me, this is manipulation
or am i missing something
any one shed some light on it for thoses no in the no !!

Vol. Sold 187,819
Sold Value £195.52k
Vol. Bought 211,919
Bought Value £220.61k

can some of you more knowledgeable ladds tell me, why so often there more buys than sell,s and price goes down,

or to confuse things even more, sometimes more sells than buys, and price goes up.
it just dont make sense at all at times

And it just aint this share, its on alot of others too.

tip fot others on large buys.
daft mistake on my part, bit forgetful, bought in one lot
Dont buy all in one.
should have bought in 3 lots
and 3 lots be 160£
1 lot 1350£
1190 would have bagged me another 1100 ish.

dont be caught out.

still, just made it up already, so far, !!!

Lloyds Bank fined £90.7m for misleading home insurance customers
UK NewsPublished: 4 hours ago
The FCA has been cracking down on insurance premiums, having found between 2018 and 2020 that most existing customers would receive a higher quote for the same product than a new one.

Insurers have previously enticed new customers with loss-making discounts in the hope of turning them into longer-term customers where higher renewals can be charged in the future.

The loss-making deals would be offset by charging higher prices to existing customers.

A Lloyds Banking Group spokesperson: “We’re sorry that we got this wrong. We’ve written and made payment to those customers affected by the discount issue and they don’t need to take any further action.

“We thank the FCA for bringing this matter to our attention and since then we’ve made significant improvements to our processes and how we communicate with customers.”
UK News

thing that bugs me is, every car insurance renewal ive ever got, ive never paid what they ask, always get another 50-100 £s off
so why not fine all and every one that sends thee,s things out

Lloyds Bank fined £90.7m for misleading home insurance customers
UK NewsPublished: 4 hours ago

The fine is the second largest handed to a retail bank in the FCA’s history after Lloyds sent 9m letters that were potentially misleading.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter!
Lloyds Bank logo
Lloyds Bank logo

Lloyds Banking Group’s insurance division has been fined £90.7 million for misleading customers over their home insurance renewal quotes.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said the bank sent out 9 million letters to existing customers between 2009 and 2017 claiming that renewal quotes were offering a “competitive price”.

But the bank would be offering lower quotes to new customers for the same product and did not check the accuracy of the messaging, the FCA found.
£90,688,400
Fine handed to Lloyds Banking Group

The fine is the second largest handed out to a non-investment, or retail, bank in the FCA’s history. The largest was also to Lloyds at £117 million in 2015 for for PPI mis-selling.

So-called “loyalty” fees, where insurers charge higher rates for loyal customers through renewals compared with new customers, are being cracked down on by the regulator, with new rules coming into force from January that will ban the practice.

Mark Steward, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: ”Firms must ensure their communications with customers are clear, fair and not misleading. LBGI (Lloyds Bank General Insurance) failed to ensure that this was the case.

“Millions of customers ended up receiving renewal letters that claimed customers were being quoted a competitive price which was unsubstantiated and risked serious consumer harm.”

The FCA accepted that the bank started removing the “competitive price” phrase from 2009 but found that a substantial number of renewals continued to include the wording.

Around 87% of renewals were agreed to by customers who received letters with the misleading wording, although the FCA could not say how much impact the wording had.

However, the FCA said this “caused a risk of harm for the majority” of Lloyds’ insurance customers “because it was likely that the premium quoted to them at renewal would have increased when compared to their prior premium”.

It added: “Renewal premiums offered to customers would also likely have been higher than the premium quoted to new customers, or customers that chose to switch insurance provider.

“This was particularly likely to be the case for customers who renewed repeatedly.”

Separately, the FCA found that around 500,000 customers were told they would receive a discount based on “loyalty” or being a “valued customer”, but the discount was never applied.

Bosses at Lloyds only changed this once the FCA’s investigation was launched.

Lloyds has since made voluntary payments of around £13.5 million to customers who received the letters about a discount that was never applied and this was taken into account w

And id wager there some in the us that would like to pick the bones of PFC and absorb them into a us set up.

My take onit, we got a US terrorist in charge of sfo. , [ to my mind, any one US, in any authority with international affairs is a terrorist, just look at the us,s track record for terrorism in one for or another ]
and the us aint to interested in a non us, or us run set up doing work with oil.
call me cynicle, but there been so many cases of us involvement in oil, which goes right up to presidents, and their familys and hangers on. manipulating things for their own benefits.
and in the process killing millions of folks.

Michael Brompton, QC, representative of the SFO, said Osofsky held only two “substantive” meetings with Tinsley, but conceded that there may have been “accidental encounters” or cases where they “met in the hallway”.

Lord Justice Tim Holroyde intervened to ask why Tinsley was ever at the SFO. ‘Why was he in the hallway? In the ordinary situation, one would not expect to find an American fixer. . . wander in the corridors of the SFO, ”he said.

Darbishire said Tinsley approached Osofsky in 2018 and cultivated a relationship with the agency. He said the SFO knew and encouraged its efforts to enter into dialogue with Akle and another accused behind the backs of their lawyers. Darbishire said Tinsley’s role was “apparently to get the Ahsanis out of the hands of the SFO” to plead and appear in the United States.

Cyrus and Saman Ahsani both confess to bribe in the US in 2019 and await sentencing. According to Darbishire, it seems unlikely they will go to jail.

Akle’s appeal has been postponed and will take place later. Another accused Paul Bond, formerly a senior sales manager at Unaoil client SBM Offshore, is also appealing his sentence.

Intresting to see Judge thought same as me about the bloke wandering about the sfo offices, dont add up, unless he was there to do a bit of bonk,n with the lady boss,!!

https://afegames.com/sfo-ordered-to-reveal-potentially-improper-contacts-with-fixer/
SFO ordered to reveal potentially ‘improper’ contacts with fixer
2 hours ago
admin
No Comments

The London Court of Appeal has ordered the UK Serious Fraud Office to hand over private texts and other evidence of contacts between the director and a U.S. judge for bribery in bribery after a judge said they were possibly “improper”.

Judges told the Transplantation Agency on Thursday that it should disclose the extent of his relationship with agent David Tinsley in Miami. They spoke at the start of an appeal hearing by Ziad Akle, a former executive at the oil and gas advisory agency Unaoil, who was convicted last year and sent to jail for bribery.

The ruling adds to the pressure on the agency and is the second time the Tinsley contacts have been reviewed. The trial judge of Unaoil criticized SFO director Lisa Osofsky last year and suggested that she fell for the “flattery” of the fixer.

Akle accused Osofsky of urging Tinsley, a former US drug enforcement official who represented Unaoil’s founder Ahsani family, to urge him to plead guilty while trying to reach a soft agreement for his to acquire customers, who are also suspected of bribery.

Akle did not plead guilty, but alleges the conduct of the SFO that led to his conviction was unlawful.

Akle’s lawyer, Adrian Darbishire QC, on Thursday asked the court to compel the agency to hand over documentary evidence revealing what took place between senior SFO officials and Tinsley to proceed with his appeal.

The Court of Appeal told the SFO to explain the “manner and circumstances in which contact was initially made between David Tinsley and the SFO”. It also ordered the agency to hand over all relevant contacts with him and compile all details of unrecorded meetings by conducting interviews with senior staff members.

Mr. Justice Jay said Thursday that there was apparently evidence that the contacts were “improper”. “What is being claimed here is very serious abuse of power by the SFO going all the way to the top,” he said.

Darbishire told the court on Thursday that Tinsley called Osofsky “my new favorite person” in a text message. He said there apparently was no record in Osofsky’s office diaries of any of the six meetings with Tinsley that Akle said took place.

The absence can ‘only meaningfully be part of or the result of a deliberate policy’, he said. ‘It can not be coincidental or coincidental that meetings take place between these two entities. . . accidentally overlooked in terms of record keeping. “Any attempt to deliberately deprive the defense of material material was a ‘distortion of justice’.

The SFO argued on Thursday that Tinsley may have inflated the number of contacts he had with the director, saying the requested disclosure would not help Akle’s case.

Michael Brompton, QC, representative of the SFO, said Osofsky held only two “substantive” meetings with Tinsley, but

Made a bomb on their shorts,
Earned 32.23 million on Petrofac Limited (history)
https://mail.shorteurope.com/history_player.php?player=BLACKROCK%20INVESTMENT%20MANAGEMENT%20(UK)%20LIMITED&land=united_kingdom

whats so different that when a well know terrorist country, tells another country that it has to do this or that or its going to face sanctions, so that countries corrupt politicians and C|EOs can reap massive payment deals
compared to PFCs Mr Lufkin trying to do good for his company.

to me, there no difference what so ever, just one is a small player, the other a worldwide terrorist who have a hold of nearly everything financial.

and here it is on II now

LLOY
400000 LLOYDS BANKING GROUP ORD GBP0.1 44.71p -0.12p -0.28% £198.784.00
some times dreams come true, but no when your awake it seems.

here on LSE, its other ay around
38.60
Bid: 44.71
Ask: 36.16
Change: -0.28 (-0.72%)
Spread:
-8.550 (-22.15%)
Open:
38.775
High:
39.27
Low:
38.60
Yest. Close:
38.88
strange goings on,!!

As I said yesterday, open price higher than should be

todays open price, 44.01
actual sell price when tried was 39.11
even though live data was showing 44.01

so cant make a 20k fortune of that idea day in day out before they cottoned on, grrrrr

any one on II seen this
or is it on other live feeds too

seen it last week or so for about 30 secs after open
SP is well above what it should be, on av about 3p up
if it does it the morrow, will try a sell then a buy back when it drops,

at 8.00 till 8.00.30

LLOYDS BANKING GROUP ORD GBP0.1 41.87p 0.005p 0.01%