Member Info for longtimeinvestor

dt
''lti you are the one who stated he was in good health ''

Yes,I have said he had no underlying heath issues when contracting covid 19

''you even stated he could walk.''
yes he could , and?

dt
''so he was in good health when passed away''

that is what I call being sarcastic.
as i have said you should have simply replied ' sorry I never realised that it was Covid 19 that he died from'
Unfortunately you were not man enough.

dt
I have stated some facts not related to what you have posted.
where did you get that idea from?

dt
btw I noted your sarcastic remark about him being in good health

dt
you simply will not give it up - now diverting from my objection to one of conspiracy.

conspiracy?

the fact is my brother did not call for an ambulance.
the fact is one of his children phoned 'as a precaution'
the fact is the hospital put him immediately on a ventilator.
the fact is a ventilator can cause damage.
end of

dt
''obviously wasn't in good health when he arrived at hospital''

are you being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative?

Please DO NOT tell me what the state of my brothers health was.

dt
''and lost a bro to poor health''

NO, someone passed on Covid 19 to him when no treatment was available.
He had NO underlying heath issues, so I suggest you shut it

dt
I respond to nonsense and incorrect info that readers may think is correct.

dt
''and lost a bro to poor health''

see what i mean

the final dividend of 1.6p will be paid if the majority of votes are in favour of it.

current permissions to purchase shares will end at the agm close of play, with the new permission starting after if the majority of votes are in favour of further share repurchases.

hu
''You don't know what I am thinking you prat! You are full of sh ite!''

I knew precisely what you were thinking when you responded to my post with-

''I would say 60p by ex dividend is as unlikely as 23p is.''

gb
''He is a fantasist''

when did you say Scotland was going to break away from the UK with another referendum?

hu
''I never did say that you said that and you know it. There you go again twisting and manipulating what others have said looking for another pointless argument.''

don't make yourself look stupid again.
You responded to my post.

Where does 60p by xd come into it if you didn't think i was saying that?
You clearly thought i was, hence your reply.
stop being foolish

hu
''I would say 60p by ex dividend is as unlikely as 23p is.''

I didn't say 60p by xd, did I? - I don't make stupid statements like that.

60p is far more likely to be reached before 23p is.

kk
don't hold your breath - 60p is by far more likely

kk

''it is wholly conceivable that you could be picking these up for below 45p next week''

why bother with that offering when you have stated -

12 Mar 2023 13:51
''I'm expecting 23p''

13 Mar 2023 09:22
''23p before ex div called it''

20 Mar 2023 21:44
''Also some are saying like myself 23p''

btw xd is in April

''rns not showing here''

I believe it was a PRN (Press Release Newswire)

good post info for this board.

Authority to purchase ordinary shares -

the maximum aggregate number of ordinary shares
authorised to be purchased shall be 6,701,169,260

lots of stocks gaining well.

UBS driver still currently chugging along the 4 Billion track - some investors may prefer a switch to the 3.5 track though

avenge share price now 20.5p

now no SB's currently open

opened at 46.982
now closed at 47.987

NC
''as we are funding our own increase, BUT we would have had a 'progressive div' without the buy backs, so we are no better off by the buybacks''

you mean like investors who reinvest their dividends to purchase more shares in order to fund their own increase in dividends?.

In the case of Lloyds having flat earnings, which Lloyds is most likely to be able to progress a dividend payment year after year -
A Lloyds making no investments with an increasing share count or a Lloyds making investments and with reducing share count?