Member Info for longtimeinvestor

Ls

''the sooner the better for kick starting the next Lloyds rally''

Lloyds does not need a base rate cut to thrive.

A cut in base rates this month would be an enormous surprise. As I have previously said, if there is to be a rate cut then August is far more likely to be earliest time.

Aat

Yes they would have affected some investors, but nothing in comparison to possibly more than doubling the tax payable on dividends for basic rate tax payers and of course higher for higher rate tax payers and limiting ISA investment benefits. Everyone to pay inheritance tax and capital gains on death?

It is in the DNA of socialists to spend other peoples money

Fakey is simply an attention seeker- proved to be fake.

No one need concern themselves with his £4,000, £4,500 + per point open sell SB 'position' if the Lloyds share price continues to go up - he will not lose money.

LS

cuts to base rates should be made only if the economy needs it, and not simply because of a 2% inflation target rate being anticipated to be reached.

In general of course, high dividend paying stocks could potentially benefit on a valuation basis with increased attractiveness against lowered market interest rates.

I wonder if the Labour party will put in their manifesto, targeted hits to stock market investment, or will they bring them in later?

Tg

''share buybacks benefit Board of Directors only.''

I have seen this endless times on different boards - it is total ballax

shareholders have to give permission for buybacks to take place.

Ht

''what date of the month''

hardly matters what day this month ,as I believe the new purchase would not be eligible for the draw until August ?

'' Always look on the bright side or you would cry about this share price!''

There would be more than the share price of Centrica for investors to be concerned about with a Socialist UK government.

New all time highs reached for AZN

Some Lloyds shareholders continuing to give up their shares cheaply

Dor

£100,000

Pan

''I see Starmer is going to tax share buy backs!''

that would be the least of an investors worries.

A good possibility once their feet are under the table - a more than doubling of the tax payable on dividend income for basic rate tax payers.

Shares in ISA's above a relatively low capital worth to be taxed as per outside of an ISA

Tet

''Market Dealer what price is your target? ''

Fakey

''sub 35p will be seen in 2024''

Tet

'' If you have shorted you are losing or in fantasy land.''

He is in fantasy land - proven to be fake

DCB

''I support Labour''

1 Mar 2024 08:16

''If they field a Workers Party of Great Britain candidate in my constituency, I will be supporting them!''

1 Mar 2024 09:57

''This win by our comrade George Galloway is a massive victory for the working class of this country.''

Norb

If you were not a shareholder on the 24th May then you are not entitled to rights issue shares at 645p per share.

Flec

You are a non shareholder who came to this board, purposely disrupting with a number of de ramping posts and an inaccurate account of the rights issue and other NG fundamentals, which may have had an effect on current shareholders actions and that of any potential new investors. It is of Zero interest to you.

Torn

'' the price rally has got them on a squeeze for the next day and a half.''

any 'short' positions of course will have the dividend amount to pay out.

Flec

''incapable of seeing other people's point's of view. ''

your dementia is getting worse - once again a point of view/opinion is a different matter to facts. Others can have as many point of views as they like as far as I am concerned

''In future feel free to tell me where I can and can't post''

I have never told you where you can and cannot post, but I have pointed out your disruption to a board where you have not a penny invested AND making misconceived posts that may influence others that are invested.

''I wont waste any more time exchanging posts with you.''

Excellent, but it would not necessarily stop me posting where you are misleading investors.

Rg27

''My father bought me £100 worth of bonds for a birthday present when they started''

you must come from a well off background with the average house price then of about £2,000.

I got bought £5 worth and not when they started

Flec

''I wasn't trying to be smart, I was just pointing out your obvious need to impress people''

Once again - incorrect - get your head straight.

The fact is because your analysing of situations, the latest being NG, where you said that sentiment had changed against NG and that about 600p per share may soon be seen, and then my correcting you on the situation, you simple do not like it. THAT is the problem behind your continuous juvenile posts.highlighting what in your head you see as 'boasting' where in fact it is another example of just the way you like to see things. You tried to then belittle my further investment in the NG rights issue, where I had not given any specific investment amount, by saying that you would be more impressed if it had been six figure sum to which you got an appropriate response.

'' You project yourself as having superior knowledge and opinion's, arguing with others who have a different point of view''

Once again (your dementia problem again ) you must learn to know the difference between an opinion and the facts of a situation. You have simply had to be corrected on things like share buybacks and recently a rights issue. You should be grateful to someone who has gone to the trouble to correct your misconceptions, rather than not liking the fact that your lack of knowledge has been highlighted, resulting in these juvenile posts of yours

''The share buyback vs divi's argument on the Lloyds forum is a classic example of your ego in action''

'ego' ? -Once again'in your head' .

My opinion as I have said many many times is that Lloyds buybacks conducted at very attractive valuations would be a good benefit to long term shareholders, which would contribute to an eventual dividend return than otherwise have been the case.

''you defend Nunn's post covid dividend cut as if your life depends on it''

why is it that things need repeating to you over and over and over again?.

A reset from a Covid hit economic situation with a resulting crash in share price was the cautious and sensible thing to do. The policies put in place will enable greater dividend returns to be made in the future as would otherwise have been the case . My life DID NOT depend upon the policies put in place.

In the case of Vodafone, I said a long time ago that that dividend should be cut and that capital should be re directed to buybacks at low pricing levels. That was my opinion and it has come about. Others may not have wanted buybacks.

You seem to learn NOTHING from your continuous juvenile posts on a few different boards -You really MUST try to stop - they simply smack of jealousy and you not liking the pointing out your misconceptions.

Flec

''You have this constant need to try and impress people on here''

There you go again - you need to get your head straight.

NO,it was a response, to you saying'' I'd have been more impressed if you'd said a 6 figure investment at 645p.'' - I gave you a response to satisfy your needs more - easy enough to understand by most.

''persistently posting your spread bets on the Lloyds forum''

I will put this down to your dementia problem, but just for you for the n'th time.

The past SB's and my purchases and sales of shares were posted as a record, so that a certain individual over a number of years couldn't get away with a constant campaign of lies against me - if you didn't have memory problems you would have known this.

'' when I made a post on the BT forum on the 16th May:

''funny how the market only now wakes up to it when it's been obvious to anyone following the company reports since then''''

''And your response was:''

"correct - that is why I had filled my boots over the last several years - hopefully in the future we can get a lot closer to the £5 figure that I made a sale at on 26th November 2015 - what goes down can go back up"

AND? the problem is?- I was in agreement about the low valuation over a number of years and my response was to readers giving them details about what the valuation had been and the possibilities that they could be reached again.The easiest way to do that was with a quick look at my spreadsheet for BT. - do you understand?.

This is how I can quickly find my transactions, prices and dates on all my different stocks.

What really caught my eye was "hopefully in the future we can get a lot closer to the £5 figure that I made a sale at on 26th November 2015"

I am glad, it was supposed to, as explained above - giving future potential - do you understand?

''you had to tell everyone you sold BT at the top of it's price range at around £5 in 2015, just to say look how good I am''

NO, get your head straight -yet again- giving readers an idea of potential.

YOU seem to have a problem because for some reason, you like to believe that stating past prices is for another purpose.

''Probably most of the readers on there don't believe you when you say stuff like that anyway.''

I couldn't give a siht. Such info is posted for the benefit of readers, who may feel disillusioned about a stock being at such a low level over such a long period of time.

I could give such help to disillusioned Vodafone shareholders also - a quick check in my spreadsheet shows that I have made a sale at over 250p in the past. Current shareholders will be hoping that in the future that those levels could be reached again.

DO NOT try to be smart with me FLEC, because as you know it DOES NOT WORK.

Flec

'' I'll spend time playing with spreadsheets and reading through articles and results''

but it doesn't appear to have been of much benefit to you.