Member Info for Legalwolf

I suppose what matters is whether enough people believe the story, and it results in a move up in the share price over the coming weeks and months, regardless of whether the story plays out as being told. I suspect Hex will attract decent buying again and think its a decent opportunity once again. As you know, always worth looking at story stocks just after a placing.

Yes fair point Karl, but I don't mind waiting extra for the results for two main reasons 1) the longer it takes, the more chance there is of getting high grade, and 2) it allows more time for cheap shares to be soaked up, so that when the news does land, you get a bigger move up. We are seeing this now, in that only a few weeks ago, I was able to to snaffle some more in the lower 6s, but now i'm having to pay 7p for any decent size, but which is still cheap. By next week, regardless of whether we get news or not, we might start to creep back up towards 8p.

If so, what it all likely means is that when the next buying wave happens and we breakout out of this bull flag, we will likely motor through into double figures. That will be February and before gold hits 3000. But it will set us up nicely for the rest of 2025.

Getting in at 7p at the start of the year, for the chance of hitting anywhere between 20p to 40p at some point in the rest of the year, is the opportunity that I think we all have here. But let's see how it all pans out. All imo and GLA

Will need to go back and check the RNS but did they actually get good enough results for that level of production. Otherwise agree.

Will do well to get large size below 7p now. News likely to land next week?

PS: Hamilton claims they are making good progress. Well why not announce the dates of the second site visit then?

I think GEX depends on your holding period. I'm not a scalper/day trader, so the short term spikes are of no interest to me. My holding period would be more of a swing move, ideally over several weeks to a few months. Therefore, a risk for me is whether there will be more selling of free shares when the lock in period comes to an end. If CSS have sold some already, then no reason why they won't sell some more is my thinking. The trolls are still hard at work, and there is still some TW noise going on. That would suggest the short/forward selling might still be active.

So for a longer hold, I would wait until early Feb at least and then see how things are looking.

They will want a return on their investment. As they have been buying at these levels, you would think that they will be supporting the share price to multiples of where it is at present. In addition to their buying, we still have buying to come from Merc and KC's contacts as well. POG is very much on the move north again.

Overall, the next breakout is potentially shaping up to be explosive, which is why I continue to be a buyer at these levels. It could end up as a technical breakout (think Friday FOMO) when folk see all the sub 7ps have dried up, or it could be triggered by PEP19, or some other fundamental catalyst. News is expected on all major fronts (Pepas, El Pantano and Anza) during Q1.

So accumulate them cheap whilst you can is what I say. GLA

That's usually how large funds/HNW accumulate. At some point we will breakout into a new leg up. Grab them sub 7p whilst you can.

Yes, just stop replying and you will starve them of the oxygen they need. Let them have their fake discussion amongst themselves and utilising their other fake accounts. For those of you that struggle not to reply to them, try for a few weeks at least. The trolls won't have anywhere to go. The trolls know which of you to target, and so they will try to bait you by targetting you personally in their posts. That way, they can spam the bb again when you respond.

Again, if you hit filter, then you can't be baited by them either. It's been a few months now since I have had to read anything from the main two resident trolls, and it makes a big difference. Now the only issue is the ones that still respond, but I am going to start filtering them as well.

Or the silence speaks loudly that this is dead. Just needs an official announcement to confirm this. All imho

The more you engage with the trolls, the more they will just spam the bb with their negative responses. They aren't bothered what you think or write back. It won't make a difference what you say, how many times you say it, whether you have a valid point or not, they aren't interested in that.

The ONLY sensible course of action is to NOT respond or reply. The only replies the trolls should get is from their own accounts, that they have set up specifically for that purpose. Those accounts can then be filtered as well.

Apparently the TSX is also good for resource stocks. There's a HNW Canadian investor on the OMI BB and it was interesting to learn from him that placings over there have an automatic lock in period, and this allows the company to use the placing funds to actually grow value. Placings are also usually also done at a premium to the share price.

Complete contrast to AIM.

Gold looking like it's heading to 3000. We couldn't ask for a better macro environment in which to release positive newsflow this year. What price might OMI reach in 2025? ATH?

You need to remember that trolls often also setup accounts where they reply to themselves and pretend to argue. This way they continue to spam the bb.

KR - last year was really good, although I still made some mistakes, which prevented it from being a great year. At the start of the year, I bought NVIDIA but then sold it a few weeks later. Had I held NVIDIA throughout the year, I would have made far more money than I did trading all the other stocks that I did last year. In fact, I could have put my feet up from January 2024 onwards. But that's hindsight for you.

So this year, depending on how the US markets go, I was thinking I might look to do more trading over there and see how that goes, and have less of my account for AIM punts. I don't know, will just see how it goes.

I won't be touching these right now for the reasons outlined. It's not about lower entry, these are already low. It's more about restoring confidence, and I can't see how that will happen for buyers until they can be sure that CSS aren't about to offload 7 million shares in Feb, AND Hamilton isn't going to drop another delay RNS?

But that's just my view - if others think otherwise, then buy away at your own risk.

Sophisticated de-ramper. Are you having a laugh? You're an unsophisticated ramper who can't actually deal with facts, because they don't suit your narrative.

Why don't you explain to the rest of us why CSS will not sell anymore of their free shares at the end of this month, or what good news there is upcoming here when we have already been told that it will take at least 60 days.

Go on, tell us what good news is coming up here which is going to cause all this buying?

Whenever I read that an AIM company has bought another asset, whilst still 'resolving' their flagship asset, it's usually a red flag. AIM is littered with such lifestylers - who plan the next ramp when the existing one is going south. Then we wonder/bemoan why AIM is struggling.

This year, I'm going to try trading more global stocks to see if it's any better than the dross over here.

I think the two main near term issues/risks are:

1) Will there be any offloading of shares once lock in period comes to an end? CSS had at least 1.7 million on IPO according to Prospectus, but by November, according to the RNS/TR1, they were down to 1.18 milllion. Does this mean they had been selling? IF so, then I would be very worried about them selling the converted warrants once the lock in period comes to an end this month? That's a lot of shares during a dearth in newsflow.

2) Will GEX report any progress on the follow up site visit, or will there be more delay?

So best to see what happens next month on the above imho. Either or both could cause another sizeable drop. All imho and dyor

The only way I can reconcile it is that the 9 million figure included all their 'interests' so included the 7 million warrants. In any case, even if they had 1.7 million on admission, then by November, they were down to 1.18 million, which suggests selling? I think both of these figures (1.7 and 1.18) are below the reporting requirements? When they got the 7 million warrants in November, it took them above the reporting requirements to 7.7%, but whilst below 3%, they could offload without any TR1?