RE: Vote25 Sep 2024 09:23
I don't get it really. The share price has surely got a minimum anyway based on the cash holding, the value of the investments. It's simple maths really that it becomes a good buy.
I don't buy the narrative that the intention was to reduce the difference between the share price and the nav. They basically bought shed loads of shares at a massively disco8nted rate and fancied doing it again.
They inky secured a small percentage of shares compared to their stated intention.. well perhaps if they had bought more aggressively then more would have sold which would habe driven the price up...... which was their stated intention.. but they didn't dud they. They are just buying back as many as cheaply as possible so they are then sat on a very valuable stock holding in a cash rich business.