Member Info for Laura2022

A quick look at your posts On FAB ladt 13mths saying everything

Ignored /filtered

Please read recent RNS

And also you answered your own question

Alice-Wright

Posted in: FAB

Posts: 57

Price: 3.50

No Opinion

Fully funded3 Jun 2024 14:26

They said ‘fully funded’ at Mayfair Presentation.

Yes, so is the £1800 and now there is no stock to buy at 0.45p

I think this could get interesting between now, the GM and the 8th Jan

Buying continues, again..at a higher price

And today

92% to the six-month volume weighted average Closing Price per Windward Share of 112 pence (being the volume weighted average Closing Price for the six-month period ended on the Latest Practicable Date);

· 97% to the twelve-month volume weighted average Closing Price per Windward Share of 109 pence (being the volume weighted average Closing Price for the twelve-month period ended on the Latest Practicable Date); an

According to telegram someone is going to nominate themselves to be an unpaid director to get this mess sorted after the vote fails

Does anyone know anything about this ?

Mr careful

Some suggestions they could easily offer shareholders 5 pence or more

People on Telegram saying someone has offered an alternative and has been posted on a website called advfn

Those 82 CHOSE to he private

Sdx didn't

Someone 12mths ago wanted about the motives of the major holder but yiu dismissed them

littlened

Posted in: SDX

Posts: 1,832

Price: 4.25

No Opinion

RE: Morocco27 Aug 2023 13:16

Maestro we are not idiots.Anyone who spends time commenting on the fortunes of a tiny company is either a shareholder or has some another agenda.Therefore you have another agenda.You are very negative on SDX therefore you want to see the shares fall to suit your purpose.I have seen this in other cases,particularly Hurricane Energy and you are obvious.You mention Aleph as p ossible predator and you may be right but even with 25% of the shares they are in no position of control.You do not comment on the net assets of SDX which appear to be well above the current share price.If they want a take over they will have to pay much more than 5p

A) that you're not connected to the company

B) that de list is the best option

Yes Porter

And I am happy to give this 12 months

Nest wishes/xmas

Check out PYC..very similar Co

I find both points hard to believe

Are you connected to the company Little ?

Only someone connected would be happy with this deal having seen your shareholding decimated from 4p to 0 4p

Each buy more expensive

Already catching a wave

More buys coming since lunch

Yes

US pharma bill + Reeve/Labour multi £££ commitment to UK listed life science gives great catalyst to GENF /PYC etc (summary on PYC board)

Legache

Surely there could be enough to block this if people add more and guarantees the block?

Kindly copied from your summary (below)

I do not believe that current management have enough sway over LTH's to persuade them and also, given how fragmented the shareholder base is, they have done enough work. Even if they were to call me and ask [I have yet to get such a call], I would tell them its a daft idea.

Yes I believe they have about 20% of the shareholder base on board, but IMO it won't be enough, but we will see. Lots of canvassing I have been doing amongst PIS - none have said its a good idea. On this board the only LTH that is not new to the board in the last month of two is Ned. He is the one and only PI that has an interest that thinks this is a good idea. Countless others think its daft!

It's clearly they only consulted their connected funders

It's obvious

People and II just add more and block this before 31st