How well is AV6000 working ?8 Apr 2024 11:44
All
Below is a copy paste from the results/conclusion section of the poster. My Laymans reading of it is the science works in that concentration of dioxrubin in the tumour is seen. But ...
I am unclear if their these are good results in terms of stopping the cancer . Anyone know ?
I note that there appear to be side effects. I was rather hoping we were entering a world of " side effect free Chemo " > Having said that is the incidence of side effects materially reduced ? I mean if a side effect was 100% and is now less than 50% that's presumably a good thing.
Being dumb I know just looking for a bit of insight from those who are more used to reading these poster exerts
here is the copy/paste
Results: Forty patients (median age 65 years, range 30-79), with median 3 prior lines of therapy (range, 0-7) received escalating AVA6000 doses from 80mg/m2 (51 mg/m2 doxorubicin; molar equivalent, 0.675) to 385 mg/m2 (260 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalent). Tumor types included soft tissue sarcoma (30%), colorectal cancer (27.5%), pancreatic cancer (20%), cancers of the biliary tract (7.5%). The safety profile was favorable, the most frequent adverse events (any grade) being fatigue (50%), alopecia (42.5%), and nausea (32.5%), with rare grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities of neutropenia (7.5%), anemia, thrombocytopenia, and WBC decreased (5% each). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included mucositis, fatigue and hematemesis (n=1 each). No grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities were reported. Two DLTs were observed of grade 2 cardiac failure (120 mg/m2; LVEF decrease 61 to 39%) and grade 4 neutropenia/ thrombocytopenia (200 mg/m2). AVA6000 distributes rapidly with a t1/2 of 45 min. The Cmax of released doxorubicin was reduced as compared to standard dose doxorubicin (range 78-93% reduction) across dose cohorts. Tumor biopsy data demonstrate concentration of doxorubicin in the TME of mean 860 ng/gm (range 76-2310 ng/gm, n=9). In contrast, blood samples taken with the biopsy demonstrate a circulating free doxorubicin of 8.3 ng/ml (range 2.4-15.9), indicating concentration of doxorubicin in the tumor relative to plasma. Using RECISTv.1.1, one PR (-65%) with duration of 6 months was observed in a patient with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma at 160 mg/m2, and a mixed response in a patient with angiosarcoma (SLD -22%) at 200 mg/m2. The disease control rate was 50%, at 12 wks. In each case, SD > 4 months or PR was associated with high FAP enzyme activity in the on-study tumor biopsy compared to observed disease progression as best response (n=6).
Conclusions: AVA6000 delivers high concentration of doxorubicin to the TME relative to plasma which results in antitumor activity in tumors with high FAP activity. A q2w dose escalation arm is ongoing.