Member Info for kkman

Let's hope so. Remember it was only last yr when costain and other companies were willing to pay over £1 for a share, and that was before their debt refinance, so surely at this price it must attract a few attention.

there will be more chance of a hostile takeover than a rights issue. I still cant understand why a significant dilution was highlighted several times in the report and mouchel allowed all this time for investors to sell out and then do a right issue, just doesn't make practical sense to me. Im just hoping the offer will be a decent one.

accumulating? the 1 mil buy looks promising.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2952083.stm pretty much how mouchel is right now. Lets hope someone snaps it up.

Whether amey is a potential bidder for mouchel. As their last minute renegotiation of their role in the bid for the contract seems abit risky if the contract means a lot to the company. Any thoughts?

http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKBRE83A0YT20120411?irpc=932

If I am right about a hostile takeover or there are still companies interested in mouchel then it could explain why he hasn't brought any shares, cause wouldnt that be classified as inside trading? Just a guess but I hope I'm right. Have a great Easter.

great company with a great portfolio, shame the sp doesnt reflect it.

i wander why a man of his experience would make such negative and pointless comments?? as if the sp isn't low enough!! or maybe it is his intention to lower the sp, but why?

This is almost like saying, you be stupid to choose us!!! What is mr rumbles playing at!!?? The company is bidding for a contract with Oxfordshire county council, about which Mr Rumbles said: “I’d be very surprised if we would be selected for that because of our current weak balance sheet.”

i really cant see a rights offering at this price! like what petertee have said, this should have been done months ago when the sp was much higher to make it worth while. I just cant imagine the board are NICE enough people to warn everyone of a significant dilution and allows us time to sell out before it happens. Alot of these right issues happens almost as a surprise just like with CAL and QED back few yrs ago.

interesting views. lets see whats tomorrow has install. GL

Wandering if there is more to mouchel than meets the eye. Having reading through their report, I notice they have highlight ' significant dilution serval times. Is this necessary? If a company exercise such option would they not want a higher sp to maximise benefit? Could they not just use dilution without the word significant? Or just simply say "all options are being considered". There is A strategy used by companies to fend off bidders known as poison pill, quote: "A strategy used by corporations to discourage hostile takeovers. With a poison pill, the target company attempts to make its stock less attractive to the acquirer. " From reading the report I feel it's trying to scared off investors rather than trying to reduce the negativity of the result, so that a higher sp can be achieve for a dilution. It just doesn't make sense?? Plus the bit that say " expect no growth etc" again is this necessary? Any thoughts? Thanks

http://www.indeed.co.uk/jobs?q=Mouchel&start=20 the list of jobs just goes on.... i thought they were cutting cost. or have they won a big contract?

Rise with no news ...SELL Drop with no news... BUY Just brought another £5k fingers crossEd too.

with all those large sell and a static share price?

This cup has a small handle!

big trades today! is something happening.

what if their target amount is more than 5mil e.g. 10mil or 20mil, then a RNS would only be disclosed after their target amount has been acheived, is that not how it works? Cos i do remember seeing very large buys in their previous accumulation but the RNS was released a week or 2 later. Thanks. You have a great xmas too.

big buys from the other day i laxey are buying more! any views?