Member Info for kingskin

this might sound 'out there', but its how i tell who to trust on cnbc etc ;) https://www.amazon.co.uk/Definitive-Book-Body-Language-Attitudes/dp/0752858785

glad you like it ;) all you need is that book, and cnbc, you are good to go ;)

lol! its this site, crashes when you post, it was down all night yesterday.

well it happens, i have bought more before when i meant to sell...we can all be a duffus ; its all fun :)

i dont use stops at all, just have my finger ready to hit the button as many times we have seen the 'flash crash' trick that wipes out stops, only for it to shoot straight up after. i always keep some cash spare though to average down if needed as long term i am optimistic on gw. but i do sell if i think we are heading down.

as the ftse is also tanking and broken through 6800 i would say things are not looking good all bios had a bad day yesterday, and i expect more of the same today best advice with onvo is to just watch it, and / or only start a small position that you add to, see it as a long term thing, so anything uder 4 is Ok, obvs the lower you can get it the better.

hard to say on onvo at the mo, it could drop lower, it c losed of support, but may drop lower again today, i see onvo as long term over next 3-4 years though. if you dont know bio's took a hit due to senate and clinton speaking out against price gouging again.

they wont make money for a few years yet, and they seem able to raise cash easy enough when required, 8 quid is peanuts,it could get there just on positive data, or certainly on FDA approval, thats why i dont understand why folk want a buy out... unless they dont believe that gw will ever generate a profit? imo it will be a few years yet, but should happen, 2020 seems to be the best bet based on analysts predictions. lets pretend GW get a hit with Glioma, it would be massive, and far surpass any of the current PT's, or a buy out within the next year.

imo, not for a while yet, and if it was it would be a disaster, gw has a huge potential pipeline, why do peeps want a takeover that generates what..10%? 20 % rise? we get that through normal trading.. i dont understand the desire, or why peeps put it out as something good. GW are completely focussed on selling Epidiolex without a partner, and imo they are smart to do so, as long as they can get the numbers that they claim.

*here

her you go.. http://www.consumereagle.com/gw-pharmaceuticals-plc-adr-unusual-bearish-options-activity-means-higher-risks/159770/

i would be happy to just sit under one ;)

i have couple of his books for reference only ;) good points about pests and disease Bob, i always wonder how GW tackle that, any ideas?

yep, bios saved by some M&A at a guess. we just got kicked back from the 100 dma on nasadq though, have to see how it pans out.

yeah i've seen big ones before, i guess the benefit of this one is the fact its always growing buds, but who has the room?

so, they just exaggerated it slightly, 28', not quite 30', exposed truth is more a case of 'lets take this story and make it more interesting'

probably an element of truth to it.

love the alien space ship one, however there is truth to the plasma bomb one.

the pages of the links you posted.

some entertaining links to the right of these pages stevie ;)