Member Info for KGR

Anyone know if Valereum sought approval from the GFSC yet....

Yeah, this is the one i had,
Says,
Our current plan is to maintain the OTCQX listing until December 31, 2021.
I thought PW said they were going to extend it for 1yr.....well it was on a video..

Oh oh contradictory comms .... ...

Is there an updated doc. For 'Argo Blockchain FAQ on OTC Change' pretty sure PW said it was extended till 2022....

Shat its pants

Problem i see for potentials is in a few months are the declining 3,6 & 12 month graphs.
This combined with the agrresive shareholder treatment over the past 9 month and bad press are not attractive, mind this includes all of us from the LSE, OTC, & NAS.

I think for sentiment to change Argo needs to find a proper chair person, they have shareholders interest at heart and lets be honest PW doesn't...not really - i wish he did.

I get the impression his employees have lost respect for PW , bordering on selling them out to for his grandure
I think PW being a master story teller ( see his linke_dIn) , who told the correct stories to get what he wanted at the shareholders expense. Takes no prisoners, well done.

Onwards - sure
Upwards - sure
Quarters - not the past few
Years - as its plural maybe.

What an experience, its only money, just need to work till im 90 now

Right ok,
What state to get into...
Still smell a reverse split on LSE ....I don't like it for many many reasons but I think that's been plan.

Unfortunately doubt is setting in on this one now

0

anyone know the criteria on the ADR delisting process and price..?
Worst case scenario i reckon but makes it still available for sale on OTC ....which was extended....funnily enough...

My main concern is the lacklustre communication on things expected and VLRM timelines being untrustworthy in accordance with their RNS's.
I am beginning to think there is more than a slight issue here and struggle to see VLRM having a use case without the :
First Series of Derivative Tokens to be Launched
Application to Trading on OTCQB, confirmed/ rejected

I don't think its their fault i think those responsible for the NFT creation have other priorities, which causes me concern that their 'partners' are unreliable and VLRM have little influence on their venture, this can be observed by the SP.

I have plenty of time to wait but is there something worth waiting for .....if so , where is it

I've been through quite a few posts and other media concerning VLRM and IMO there's nothing positive or anything to invest in here other than the 'possibilities' of something, literally nothing.

Dont you guys want some un/official communication about what VLRM said they were going to achieve icluding the OTC status (which will be **** anyway) and the NFT and how much of that has actually been achieved.

As a shareholder its concerning to hear about a "road map" with no fruition or results and a declining shareprice

even the fanboys must be getting slightly frustrated

Personally, I read into that screenshot as "please keep the faith" not many trades....no one is buying the share on the unofficial false promises.
Nothing to buy into here ...just promises and options for the fanboys

https://cointelegraph.com/news/victory-is-for-the-taking-in-friday-s-950m-bitcoin-options-expiry

Problem is monk guy is raising valid points.
The offensive replies show a bit of weakness.
This BB is visible to all and the backlash is unjust.
Its alright saying patience etc, but promising stuff in media and not delivering is a cause for concern.
I believe there are highly respected members of VLRM who do read this stuff and having investors losing confidence isn't a call to arms its a growing concern that requires some communication +ve or -ve
Things take time but when the timeline shifts to the right maybe a statement in relation to un realised 'things' may be welcomed to provide an understanding...

Been watching some videos and literature social media and RNS trying got get up to speed with this,
Did the VLRM NFT get created in sept or October as one video I watched said it was expected even before then....I can't find anything which confirms this has happened.

Are there a sequence of events before this is realised...or has it just not happened yet

I was actually trying to get some real info from those who have been here a while, obviously you're not that person.
And just a childish imbecile.

Is this about reducing transaction fees....really...
Thats not much really im sure there must be more to it than this

Hmm,
Doesn't really sell to me on that basis.
Unless you use crypto this has no influence does it.
I mean I'll just use my £££ to buy shares instead of crypto that'll save me a fee aswell ....no crypto fees , no VLRM platform fees (if it will)
Best route I see for this is to transfer crypto into an ISA by buying available shares...
Maybe I'm not grasping the advantage of this idea but...seems like a good idea when no fiat exists...

Cheers

BTW you shouldn't direct potentials to a telegram group....it defeats the exposure

Forgive my ignorance but,

I can trade my crypto into Fiat and buy stocks or shares
Why do I need a middle man ...with the added commission

I suppose if fiat disappears then I see the point but we all know it really won't,

OTC back to pinks if you don't convert...at a price

https://argoblockchain.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Argo-Blockchain-FAQ-on-OTC-Change.pdf