Member Info for katstrangler

Nm

Patients?

"NURSE!"

I think you now get my drift!

God, some people.

if you want to reply to someone trash talking write a new header tweaking their negative headline.

Gla.

True. but it's there for anyone to read.

and, you have to admit, they're all better than 'news could appear in the next 30 minutes' which someone (!) mentioned a couple of das ago. (i still enjoyed our Egyptian banter, though... so, nothing personal).

But i can see i'll be accused of manipulation and moving the market if there's a dip today so i'll refrain from posting for a while, so that only the upside can be posted!

gla.

I suggest you read my posts again. i mean binary that it either happens or it doesn't, ie. as far as the sp is concerned, if there's a rejection with proposals on how to reapply that will still deeply affect the sp. and an approval with benefit the sp.

stated in all of today's posts that a delay/deferral is possible but, as far as the sp is concerned, it will be a negative.

i suggest you read what i'm saying, properly a,s so far the accusations have been soooo erroneous that it's getting boring. stop trying to incriminate what is just bloody obvious and straightforward.

(and, seeing as i still have a smaller stake, i too would rather there was good news as i've no idea what the value of the company is without Sandbox, even if only temporarily.

Plus, i've never said 'to the moon' or suggested as such. i leave that to the rampers who talk about 10p. i will be happy with 2.5 on good news.

I don't think i said anything about #GST being 'finsihed'? that's your interpreteation. all i've said is the applicaton for Sandbox will either be approved, or not approvad or delayed/deferred.

There zero need to impune any kind of absolutism in my post. the compnay still exists with or without Sandbox and could even be reapplied, if negative.

Binary means just that: GST either gets approval now or it doesn't. And, with feedback, could probably reapply too. Never spoken about the future viability of the company, ever!

Feels like you're merely trying to discredit a bit of balance?

And since when has balance been deramping.

buggger all point in raving about the '917's but ignoring the sizeable sells too.

lets face it, until there's a leak, one way or t;other, the sp is stuck in a 1.25 > 1.17 > 1.25 range, which i pretty much the spread. it's literally now just you've made your mind up what the future holds and waiting for the news to prove it!

Flava, you're better off thinking about your own holding.

i took out most of mine becasue i don't like binary.

made that point already... not interested in trading this now as the spread is the top and bottom of the price. there's nothing in it to trade.

i'll wait for good news to buy in on the rise... or not!

but good luck with your investment.

Like to believe that we've seen the bottom but would be better still if we get the same kind of ii buys that we got on the last rise into 40s.

Appreciate that shares can't be mvoing every minute of the day but this still sitting at 11p is... annoying, to say the least. (calm, calm, calm, calm, calm!)

If you want fun go find a penny arcade.

this bb is supposed to be for people investing some very serious money.

Ffs, people, since when has one anonymous poster bigger than the name of the company?

focus on the story or the opinion and stop replying to posts with the name. getting tired of the moronic banter about individuals rather than the companies.

The sells were for lower than the buy so it would have been a loss, not a profit.

need to stop with the conspiracy explanations and just see the sp and where it is... no one buyer OR seller is much of an indicator of anything.

Again, the question is binary: did tey do that cheapy placing at 1p because there was a golden opportunity that needed cash, imminently or did they do it then because it was belt and braces in case there might be a negative, meaning they'd have to place lower,?

you have to make your own mind up until news is released and explained.

tough biz, investing/trading!

This notion that bad news is immediately obvious whereas good news isn't would suggest that the company would have to be idiots and submitted their application in green crayon, for it to be delayed or 'bad news' whereas 'good news'would be impeccably written in quill and ink with embossed paper.

the fca presumably would take as much time rejecting or deferring a result as passing it as they would be required to explain their reasons, to give options to the company.

just holder bias to believe bad news arrives quicker than good.

it is what it is and you won't know until it's delivered. (just an opinion but i don't see a hole in that argument.)

That's if you're talking about the dozen sells that dropped the price back down to 11p.