Member Info for katstrangler

Ah, yes, war. because we had it wrong in 1936. what i totally nobby thing to say. especially about that fat slug of a self-interested liar. of course he didn't start wars because he don't give a sh** for anyone but himself.

that fat fu** is a symptom of a dysfuntional society. but i suppose one can't blame an std for existing... blame the amorality that created it.

meanwhile, GST holding nicely at 0.7ish. let's see where it goes from here. but looks settled, over a couple of days.

All anecdotal until there are some sales figures released officially.

and 'not looking at the sp' is a bit bonkers if one is holding or maybe looking to get in/average down.

They seem committed to selling regardless of price. just bizarre that they waited for the recent fall back to decide to sell. see if 5 wobbles...

You really need to read the posts better. i've pretty much said that i think there's a drop to 0.6 coming. i'm hoping for less, obviously. if it's a flash drop then there's a good chance of a quick bounce. alternately, i'd be happy to buy a chunk at sub 0.6 in expectation of a rise, eventually.

that's not 'rank stupidity'. tha'ts playing the market volatility between news. it's rank stupidity to make personal attacks on the opinions expressed about a share price that's pretty much doing what has been posited.

It's getting close to half the placing price that bought the asset! so, yes, it's sinking.

pick whichever number satisfies you that you're safe here but don't pretend it's doing well atm.

It's tiresome when you endlessly repeat your supposed past glories to make up for the dismal performance of this sp.

historically, i remember you banging on at the recovery here when it was a 1.09 from 1.6ish.

we're now at 0.66 and going the wrong way again.

while i don't enjoy discussing the negatives of the sp's progress, you do attract a reality check here with your endless self referencing.

i get your cambative nature as you'e frustrated at folk maybe calling out the progress better than your good self but just take objective opinions for what they are. wither discuss them or dismiss them. nothing more needs saying. certainly not a financial 'see that good looking bird, there? i've had her' rhetoric.

Said the man who constantly tells the bb that he's had 'another cheeky top up' at various prices from 0.6 > 1.5 and supports his rubbish trading/buying with historic tales of being a millionaire when he bought Standard Oil back in 1888.

and you have the nerve to 'oh, dear' me! : )

Not a popular share, though. most people who hold are those who got spiked, i suspect, now waiting on good news to reconsider their holding.

not heard anything, pr wise, from US. without conference attendances, press coverage and general media attention, not sure how the sp benefits from US.

Don't need my hand held. sold the spike. waiting for sub 0.6. if i don't get it, fine. other shares to buy.

and, as far as the strategy is concerned, that has seen the sp range from 0.3 > 1.8 so the strategy is irrelevant to the push and pull of the sp.

no issues from me. i'm a happy chap with my trading of GST.

Having got the acquisition (and i keep reiterating the funds were obtained at 1.1p and the sp is 40% down on that price) the next company news is... ?

try punting a date for something substantial that will push the sp back over 1p and you'd be thumbing through the calendar and guessing.

i would also note that the BoD haven't dipped their hands into their pockets to buy any shares at the damaged price. folk keep talking abut them having a 2p average as if that's a good thing! if anyone here has a 2p average they'd be looking to add and yet they had the change from 0.3p upwards.

not a great look.

LLoyd is COPL is your idea of an investment then no onder you'e bitter. a LOI means nothing. it's as useful as any company that 'intends' to be successful. i daresay you'd ridicule an LOI if it were issued by GST.

probably need to take out your anger on the COPL bb on its slide from 20p in a year nstead of venting here.

I don't think the company can state what the FCA investigation about with certainty as that'll depend on the FCA and whee their rather toothless investigations take them. but, i'd suggest the bigger fly in the ointment is BOO, trying to work the share in its favour. i wouldn't be surprised to see them selling a tiny proportion but big enough to start the ball rolling. i'd say they'd quite like REVB to go bust, if it were possible (not saying it is!) as it's a good string to their bow. but how they'll react? i only see them as bad actors. will be a relief for those in if nothing happens. traders will want it oversold for a bounce but, beyond tomorrow and possibly the next day, while it'll recover it's not a great look for a share that already been burdened by some well dodgy dealing in the boardroom.

And, roughly this time last year the placing was at 85p. so, depending on how you look at it, 32p is a bloody good price for a top up. what, me? ramping?

Https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/investing/article-11420173/MIDAS-SHARE-TIPS-Cash-breath-fresh-air-asthma-victims.html

I quite fancy a revisit of 43 and then we'll see if that puts the brake on the sp or whether we start the journey back to previous placing prices, if nothing else (not the 25p one, obviously!)

That solar IS cheaper than oil... that oil gets as many (if not more)subsidies as any renewables and that bashing the BBC as some kind of shill for the illuminati and the great reset is about as childish as it gets.

noel chumpsky sounds like those nobodies who suddenly think they have insight that elevates them out of their sad little lives AS a nobodies because they've suddenly discovered a 'truth' that the norms just live with.

Https://www.iea.org/topics/energy-subsidies

Those already in pretend they've got everyone's best interests at heart but, really, they just want more buyers so their share increase in value. in the end, it's as morally bankrupt as anyone saying they think the share's going to drop.

why do folk all start trotting out ridiculous targets on good news? shirley it's not because they're in it already and want to be in bigger profit???

there is no real moral high ground to be had, though, if one is looking to a share to make money. i agree that mendacious posting is horrible. but just stating a low price expectation is no different to stating 'this'll be 10p in two years".

Oh, and anyone who talking about 'ducks lining up' isn't an investor, they're just someone playing at investing. you need to grow up an stop talking out of your trousers, chap.

you'll be quoting warren next but you sound like you trade like jimmy.

If you're down and 'don't give a toss' then you're a rubbish investor. you're waiting for it to bag, at least, yet you need it to bag just to get back to evens.

you should give a toss as you've only got half a toss atm.