Bfd...28 Jun 2024 11:46
There isn't any balance on the bb. it's just accepted that the sp is where it's at because of trolling or mms 'playing on fear' or all the other justifications for the low sp.
but it's patently obvious that the last placing had a rampy element to it, in the possible placing. still might happen but i've explained a few times where companies have stated what the target acquisition wa and then placed specifically for it, rather than just asking for a top up, 'in case'.
so i don't think my postings about the negatives in any way compensate for the thousands and thousands of 'this is going places' we've read in the past six months.
plus, why have a twitter account if it's not to add such items as was posted earlier by Sunny. i haven't seen a twitter page from a company that DOESN'T add peripheral info to add to the understanding of what they do.
as for the retailer percentage, my point was we had 2 ex BoD who sold over 20% of the company and neither the other BoD members or any HNWIs thought it worth a punt or averaging down at 0.9 and lower. that tells me something, even if it doesn't tell you anything.
there are a lot of negatives about the company. maybe they don't stack up against all the potential but, unless you're attributing all the downturn from 1.05 to l'il ol' me, then there is a proportion of holders who also think there's a distinct lacking from the company in supporting their shareholders in understanding their game.
and, if there's no news on monday, then i'll be happy to take some shares sub 0.7, if it happens. but only because, if the news isn't good then i'm closer to the low price it might hit. it'll still hurt but i'll live with the hope that the price gets so low that a bounce is due (from all the ramping that'llsuddenly go into top gear here!)
i think that's a fair and balanced pic, myself.