RE: GROWTH20 Jul 2024 16:56
... not sure in what way Wellesley has 'smashed it'? do you mean his reputation (?) or for GST. if GST, what evidence is there for that?
there are too many vague 'all we need's when they are phenomenally difficult hurdles. how long has GST been engaged with FCA now and what clout does a single 'Lord' have with labour govt to manipulate anything? in fact what benefits has it actully bought so far, beyond an understanding of the process?
only things i can see for the sp currently is it is historically cheap (only tine it was cheaper was during the clns and we know that was an eff up, which shows BoD aren't infallible) and there are a lot of 'maybes' that, if they were to come good, one by one, would indeed increase the sp.
the difficulty is how long do you have to keep holding to realise those successes when, when all's said and done, investing isn't a one-horse race! for every day/week/month this doesn't rise holders are not just on a paper loss but also missing out on chances elsewhere. and i reckon that, for most, there must need to be nearly a bagger just to get back to evens and that's not a great place to be.
everyone will be willing for the results to be seriously good to show show future potential but, other than the still dubious Easysend new date, coinciding with the Semnet final payment, there aren't any definites in the diary. So, while the results migh prove significant revenue, after it peaks you have to just hold an hope that the next rns comes out of the blue.
i wonder how many will be so relieved at 1.23ish to want to move on and how many will see that as pivotal to recovery?
guess we'll see.