Member Info for katstrangler

And, on checking your own posting history... 🤡

... but THAT's a valuable post?

For whatever reason (!) real boiler rooms are ramping shares with new accounts endlessly, now.

i report them and ask them to check the ip if possible, to ban the laptop/mobile, not just the account.

Into Feb on Monday so would like to think, even if there's no rns, will start getting the interest for March news.

Bake is my example... Hosp posts relentlessly... even been quoted here for his posts... he is a great figurehead for the company, in spite of the fact it crashed and burned giving the opp for GST to take them over. that's not antithetical to being verbal.

Wellesley, considering his 'englishness' and ability to speak it (!) has promoted nothing, outside of buying some shares at their cheapest.

just... poor/non-existent pr. using twitter doesn't mean having to lie. but if language is the barrier that means linkedin 'likes' is the best BoD can do then maybe get someone who can do it well, across all media?

as folk keep saying, we're not AIM and have a presence in the UK markets. but their twitter account is dead... as and english dodo.

Billy is spot on with his mm comments. when there's little volume they make their money on widening the spread. that makes the drop look worse but it's the buying price that's important.

still argue that pr 'research' doesn't come close to the company making the same points. smae with podcasts, same with anything that proves there's forward movement with the company (of course there''s always things going on bu it shouldn't be down to pi's to second guess it). when pi's look at linkedin to guess whether Rolls Royce is a connection or integration is going to happen next day because someone 'worked all night' then things are getting a bit rabid. but if the company posted such stuff...

...1.9 doesn't seem like strong support...

Because they were going to get them at an obvious discount and most buyers realised/hoped the sp would bounce right back... it did, slightly and pulled in more buys, thinking 3p would arrive imminently. those that could forward sell did, those that waited for their holding then sold at whatever profit they could get from 1.9. those with no real interest in the share will even sell at a small loss to move the money elsewhere.

but even i'm surprised that 1.8 doesn't seem particularly like strong support.

there's certainly not a lot of buying, considering all the news that is being promised. guess that's because most of the fans threw the sink at it in the 3s, thinking an easy '4p next' was worth the risk and now don't have spare cash.

...weren't 'suffering' from the drop.

You DO talk rubbish!

unalloyed fans of the company looks for any excuse why their beliefs aren't coming true every day. they won't criticise the company for lack of news so criticise posters who point out the lack of news.

they criticise posters for the horrible placing price and they criticse posters for pointing out it did nothing for retailers, in spite of them 'taking care of them'.

they criticise posters for selling but all like to pat themselves on the back when the sp rises.

it'd be funny if holders weren't holding from the drop!

The volume here seems to have two gears: the lows are roughly 15mill, the good days are 30+mill, news days are 50mill...

y'day and today are low days but, at least it's stil hovering at around the placing price...

Atm, noticed that even the mms aren't interested in trying to shake the sp. hardly any trading at all... surprised that there aren't buyers in at placing price, considering it was oversubscribed. but i guess none of them were intending to hold for the duration and just were hoping for a trade.

still, odd that even the mms have moved on as we're now stuck until there's a catalyst, one way or t'other.

... unless, that is, you're a trader and enjoy the spikes and troughs.

The gripes are that the sp fails to hold rises. admittedly it's up from the lows (but the lows were self-inflicted and there are an awful lot of buys that have been well over the 1.9 placing that are all retailers, including the dumping by ex-BoDs and the placing) so i think folk have a right to ask why the company doesn't do more to support the retailers with intra rns'... they are, after all, holders of something like 70% of all the shares... any ii who had even 10% of the share would be getting lots of 'news' between news so it's not outrageous to think a 70% holder would be entitled to expect the same.

I said new name, not new account. new to posting here... i saw your history. same one-liners this morning as all the new accounts.

That, Billy, is the most honest and courteous you've been to me since...

have to say, though, that RR has been infinitely more solid and with infinitely more recognition than this. but, fair play if you think this is going to be the new play.

the difference between the two, besides the very obvious, is that every single move that RR takes is reported. thee isn't anyone really reporting on the steps between rns' which, my repeated bugbear, is where the company really outght to step in. no point having twitter if they can't at least match the enthusiasm @bake_io have for their product. very much the tail showing the dog how to conduct itself in pr.

... says yet another new name... day after day, after day, after day!

i might as well hope for 1.7. happy to be insulted if i can get that price...

Billy, if that is the case, then why aren't there reciprocal buyers coming into this for the 'imminent' news?

at 1.8 one would have thought this was a screaming buy...

also, if you understand this 'mechanism', then i presume you'll be taking advantage of the chancers looking elsewhere and dropping the price?

I don't think anyone is selling 1.25million shares based on the conversation going on here.

... because the 0.6 was a drop caused by clns. the 'rise' is merely reversion to the price before the cln crash. the fact that the BoD bought at 2p years ago says... something.

the argument about progress is strong but the sp, outside of the ramped spike, isn't proven yet, on a stable sp.