Unanswered questionsToday 10:43
Are we to believe that if the Board has been talking to the LOI investor for over 12 months, and, more recently, at least one, if not two, or more, other potential investors, that any offers of investment that have been forthcoming have been sufficiently poor that the current placing, retail offer, warrants, etc., is in the best interests of the shareholder? Or, have any of the above investors made offers, which were not acceptable to the Board, because, for example, they included changes to the Board? Whatever the answer, most shareholders have seen staggering dilution, as a result of the Board's actions.
The same Board which was instrumental in dismissing two fellow board members on grounds of alleged financial mismanagement (something that should not be done lightly), yet, now, they have, more than tacitly, suggested that the allegations would not stand up in court - or that it would not be best use of the company's money to pursue recovery of said alleged (significant) sums through the courts. Were the grounds of dismissal really that fickle/uncertain?
Still, at least this placing allows a board member to acquire 90,000,000 shares at a vastly discounted price.