The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
BIG multi-bagger behind the scenes - Ghana ratification?
This goes huge......
Ghana ratification alone sends the SP from .5 to 4.5
DYOR
What's being leaked.....Ghana ratification = BOOM
Bolivia JV = BOOM
This will rocket quickly....you can't buy
So the market to be in for the foreseeable is MASKS!
Anyone know of a company about to produce COVID Killer masks to scale, rather than supply basic masks to no avail, in the immediate term...?
Am loading up big first thing
Stand by.....from SCC today....
The SCC Monitoring Officer is currently reviewing the decisions made at the SCC Planning and Regulatory Committee that took place on Friday 27th November 2020. A response will be sent to you as soon as possible when this review has concluded
In summary, on the basis of advice received from Counsel, there is a significant likelihood that the irregularities arising from the technical difficulties at the meeting on 29 June 2020 render the resolution to refuse invalid and would render any notice of refusal unlawful. The most appropriate and fairest course of action is to take the application back to committee. This is what the Council has decided to do.
In more detail, the complaints related to a number of issues including:
- A councillor made a presentation to the Committee in her role as member for the electoral ward but in addition made further contributions later during the Committee’s deliberations.
- A number of the members of the Committee who participated in the debate in respect of the Application did so with assistance from individuals who were not members of the Committee.
- The live feed of the meeting dropped out on a number of occasions. Web-cast viewers witnessed a Councillor attempting to verbalise his vote on the refusal motion but not being able to do so because of technical issues.
- On the basis of the numerous technical difficulties in the Committee meeting, it cannot be concluded that members and the wider general public were able to hear and understand all relevant arguments being made.
- some members of the Committee were engaging in electronic communications with non-Committee members during the debate on the Application.
- The procedure at Committee did not allow for a proper assessment of the material considerations. As a result, the planning balance performed by members was inaccurate and incomplete.
- The Council’s Code of Best Practice in Planning Procedures states that when a resolution is proposed which is contrary to an officer recommendation, “The Chairman will summarise, or cause to be summarised, the salient points of the debate, and ensure the t
ext of the proposition is clearly understood before putting the matter to the vote”.
- The motion approved by the Committee to refuse the Application was not made on any valid planning grounds.
Counsel’s view was that the most significant issues at the meeting were in relation to the question of whether councillors were “in attendance” given the committee meeting was held remotely. This was the first planning committee meeting the Council had held under the provisions of the Local Authorities and Police Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020, (the “Regulations”) which set out the conditions when a councillor is “in attendance” at a meeting.
The issues included:
- the live stream dropping out from time to time. In most cases this was rectified immediately by the relevant speaker being asked to repeat his or her statement in full. However, a portion of a speech
not lost....subject to the Ctte - not the motion
indeed - it will pass
Rightly though, it must pass through 'due process'....objections being part of that process....
Then there is the law....as the greater part of said process......
It will pass - 'fret ye not - ideal time to get in!
maybe a role for you on SCC........!
.5 by the 27th 1000....
.275.....
opening at .33 tomorrow....rinse, repeat.....
Rob
Point being....
you can expect to see a surge in the next 48 hours....
However, if you are invested here, I would suggest that you undertake research as a means to maximise your investment...hence the importance of Surrey Council approving the permission for the UKOG development at Loxley.....
You'll know about the background on that proposal....I hope!
Good luck and enjoy Monday
As ever DYOR
Rob
1 - are you invested here?
2 - what's your average....?
That's why it will rise.....on sentiment
You know what's happening this Friday don't you....?
Expect .4 before then.....
then .7 1600 27th.....
1.2 0800 30th...
Sentiment refers
It's coming home, it's coming home....
intent top slice at .28 in anticipation of .38 then .48 moving back toward .98 over the next 4 weeks
UKOG is coming home
Gonna be huge.....
sorry.....just in, long day....
I've missed something? Quick overview much appreciated...trying to discern quality from quantity on the board....
Fact - there is no silver bullet to COVID
Fact - every government is desperate to find the 'silver bullet' - that doesn't exist
Fact - a comprehensive approach will be required - that means masks, masks, masks - as a normalised need
Buy, Buy, Buy, Hold, Hold, Hold then - is your golden bullet!
They're stating on the RMS board that they are the next NCYT....?
From 1p to £10.....
DETERRENCE is THE big sector to be in now - really noisy over at RMS - the world is turning to better masking with society now normalised to them long-term
DETERRENCE is the way to go....whilst the world struggles with detection