Member Info for jplay

The question of display will come up and mike will say we need a oem to release a mid weight display yawn.

So basically Nanoco has no product due to a oem not releasing a mid weight qd display. All these years and time on display. Seems legit. We should not question this response.

Most probably BS. How many times did mike mention the big S? Hinting Samsung. Keep investors on their toes. I expect some news on display today. If yes then I will be over the moon. If no then Mike is full of BS lying for the last 5 years about being close.

You dont need to talk nanoco down. Mike 14 months ago said first display q1 2018. With a possible fund raise needed. Seen as though cadmium ban in less than a year and 5 years since they said they would supply LG that we will hear something on display maybe one of the 13 oems. I do not see what excuse they have now. If they do provide news on display then no need for fund raising. All we want is for them to do what they have been saying for 5 years. Otherwise what is to stop the new contract disappearing without a trace as so many before have done.

Many topics go quiet with nanoco. Reading or watching the past years announcements is insane. Such as Dow now ramping up or Dow and commercial orders. Yet not a single display released.

Take a shot every time mike says believe. Drunk in the first 5 minutes of the agm.

Dam if Nigwit is torn

Then nanoco have screwed up more than we could of ever imagines. All these years waiting for rohs to come into effect for it to be extended for a couple more years and now that we are 11 months away from an apparent ban it seems nanoco's focus of display is minimal and the hope for the future is an unknown company, it is still speculative as to who .

Here we are 5 years after the news of the LG deal and we still have no display.

All are welcome to the AGM to voice your concerns.

The question of fund raising has been asked in video interviews and nanoco have also commented on this issue. Hence cost cutting plan b and plan c that they set up. Asking is not a crime. Nanoco has been famous for one area display yet all of a sudden silence. From 8 or is it 13 own programs to silence is worrying. Did I miss the memo that it is gone? Rns to release news of new partnerships to silently disappear. If that is the case what is to stop the newest partner disappearing without trace. If nanoco was truthful about oems wanting our dots then why the silence. We still need income. Waiting for the new partner to open the pockets could be some time away. It is healthy to ask questions

I only asked three questions. Nothing negative. 1.What can be expected at the agm? 2.Any news about ces 2019? 3.maybe the question of fund raising could be asked at agm. The repsponce I got. Don’t expect anything from agm. Display is dead. And loam are invested. I still don’t get how we went from 8 oems programs and all oems want our dots to display is dead. So does nanoco just give up and move on. Until recent all nanoco preached about was display. Have Dow, Wah Hong and Merck given up as well. People can speculate but if you ask a question the weelweel police arrive. you bring nothing to the table you just hang on to coat tails. Think for yourself.

Great question to ask at the agm. Will we need more fund raising.

8-11th January any news of nanoco attending with the famous pouffe

Any one expect anything from the agm in 8 days? Or just a rehash of the last presentation.

It was over a year ago now that Mike said the famous words, Q1 2018. Then changed to Q2, Q3 and then a it will be in stores for Q4. Now it is some time in 2019. Who knows maybe, would be good if a display comes out this year ahead of extended schedule. Reality it might be some way away. Who knows. All guessing.

I understand this. Cadmium in automotive and light bulbs. We have seen the news of possible recall over vw veichles. Display has been long over due. Why the two extension so far. What was the argument to extend and will it be used again? I also recall China was putting place a cadmium ban similar to rohs

First news of a display being released by ceo and already it is at least 12 months delayed maybe longer. I still say as I have many times befor how can you enforce a ban when only one oem is providing.

Btb are doubting your view. Selling out at 48 was great but seems like you missed the boat on buying cheap.

Short term will be the rohs enforment or extension. Honestly I can see it being extended. If nano are not making any real sales and they label themselves as no1 signs that multiple oems will not be ready for 11-12 months time. Extension highly likely, just like the time before and the time before that. If signs of Dow in production start soon then great sign. If not let’s hope it is Apple. Any news on Trevista?

BTB what is your take now? change of mind or still see it as a ramping

A little premature Paolo

The issue has always been the thickness of qd’s compared to oled. Hence tv and computer displays and not phones or wearable tech.