RE: Anyone understand the reference to 2022?25 May 2020 16:04
The only person who knows why Zaza is speaking to everyone else but shareholders is Zaza. I hope there is a good reason for this and one day we will find out one way or another. My only concern is that he sees no value engaging with us as we are not part of his future plans, hope/pray I'm wrong!
RE: Article - “ Two truths about two televisions about "Frontera"24 May 2020 18:50
I know some keep claiming Zaza is maintain radio silence, choosing not to communicate, being advised by lawyers not to say anything etc, etc. Unfortunately you couldn't be more incorrect, he certainly has not maintained radio silence and is communicating on many levels as uncovered by our super sleuths. Why he is choosing not to communicate with shareholders is anyone's guess, hopefully if this comes good he will not only share communications with us but also the rewards.
RE: Article - “ Two truths about two televisions about "Frontera"24 May 2020 12:44
Free no offence taken, what we all have in common is that this will eventually come good one day. Hope things get better for you soon and Zaza's hard work pays off for us all. I've noticed some posters on here agree that Zaza should ignore the requests to communicate with shareholders until this whole debacle is over, only major fault with that argument is that he is already communicating on several levels as our super sleuths have found. Why he can't drop an email to someone like Mole or FSHG to then pass on to shareholders I don't understand. Like I have said before it doesn't have to be something that shows our hand or in fine detail, just a quick email to inform us what's already been put out there by him in case we missed it.
RE: Article - “ Two truths about two televisions about "Frontera"23 May 2020 20:36
ODR this is what I can't get my head round. He's clearly fighting very hard for us whilst putting millions of his own money into the company, yet can't even pass on to us vital info that he's put out to the general public. If this was to ever come good we all deserve one big p*** up
RE: Article - “ Two truths about two televisions about "Frontera"23 May 2020 20:29
Free must admit I wasn't expecting such a response, your blood pressure must be similar to mine lol. Completely agree with you that he has to play the game and should only show his hand when it causes maximum damage. However when he has done this rather than hoping the super sleuths find out (they won't all the time) just drop someone like Mole or FSHG an email to say he's done x, y or z and to pass on the info to fellow shareholders. Not looking for a cuddle from Zaza, just to pass on vital info to shareholders that he's already put out there.
RE: Article - “ Two truths about two televisions about "Frontera"23 May 2020 20:01
Free can you tell me why he's never had the decency to respond to anyone who has supported his company for many years, I know there's a game to play but can still communicate with people. No one is asking him to reveal his strategy, just maintain basic communications with those who have supported him over the years. Keep up son ;-)
RE: Article - “ Two truths about two televisions about "Frontera"23 May 2020 19:49
Only thing that annoys me about info like this coming out is why on earth can't Zaza pass this information onto shareholders, why is it we have to find out via the super sleuths on this board. Time and time again the super sleuths find vital information important to our survival yet Zaza can't even be bothered to respond to an email from FSHG, and please can no-one use that very tired argument that it's important not to show our hand during court cases, he's more than happy to go on TV and tell the world!
So is the next stage to become an action group if FSHG has 'so far failed'. Thanks for the efforts you guys have put in, it's just a shame Zaza is treating those of us who have invested in his company with such disdain. I can't get my head around why he can't communicate with us, even just basic information that doesn't prejudice any court case.
Think it's a little beyond that now, can't use the argument were not going to do anything whilst the legal stuffs going on. If you're a decent director you would keep some form of communication going on with a shareholder group that has the best intentions at heart for the company. If FSHG aren't going to do anything especially with what's just happened there's no point in having the group.
Is there any reason our great leader couldn't update us shareholders, who he allegedly cares so much for, with this news. Have FSHG had any communication from FRR or do we have to keep relying on the super sleuths for info? We can't keep making out its because everything is in lockdown because of the court case when we keep finding info like this.
Is that we need an update from FRR. Not asking for too much detail but I think it's only fair that us loyal long term holders get some kind of update. This will then stop all the guessing, upset and fallout that's going on!