Libero8 Dec 2013 11:03
ebitda is a tool of mass deception lol
..EV/EBIT is the gold standard imv...the equivalent of p/e but adjusting for capital structure.......though there is no one size fits all approach, EBIT is my starting point.... but I always think whether I should apply Jolly adjustments to better match the measure of profitability with the measure of value, EV (so on DWHA, for example, I use EBITAG...excluding amortization and goodwill write down)
....there is at least one huge exception (blunder in) using EV/EBIT...that is where the T matters and is odd like for oillies (eg BG where the tax rate is v high)..there p/e is much better
...back to usual companies, they clearly need to invest to survive and grow...and dividing between sustaining and growth capex is about as difficult (and important) a challenge as any an analyst faces imv
...so for software companies (cf SPE), ebitda can give a wildly inflated perspective on profitability...relative to size, SPE's spend on R&D that is not expensed is huge..so either EBIT minus that year's R&D spend (if analyst is being severe) or EBIT but not EBITDA...if you go to the lse bb thread and go back a few pages you'll see a whole who's who of respected posters who perhaps did not grasp that enough lol
...so, for me, the fun, is working out what makes the company tick to decide what metric to employ
..I've had a Jolly dull life!!
...aaoo/pls consult an expert!!