Participate in Share Chat. Set up virtual watchlists and portfolios See more trades and share info.
Register for FREE Now
jollyspeculator
Posted in: BARC
Posts: 25,415
I cannot see Barc staying independent at these multiples
Posted in: FIPP
If they have any sense, they'll try to sell some of one of their stakes in a funding round for one of their plays but it won't be easy
Lol
Posted in: VTU
And even TNAV hasn't provided support in the recent past
Amazed if the sp doesn't retest at least the 50-55p area
Posted in: BXP
The trend both here and AIM in general ...and we can always hope a Santa
Flexibility when the facts change, I change my mind and you?
Posted in: REDD.L
1600/230 or 240, so c7
EV/ebit for this year c£1500/£230 or £240, so 6-7 That's not wildly cheap, but the cheap debt, decent management (didn't buy Halfords for some silly price), strong growth make this a buy imv tp £6
Posted in: MGAM
Rev to £1.4-£1.5bn op margin to high teens ===> mouth wateringly cheap plenty of execution risks, but I quite like Raby (and he is putting some skin in)
Posted in: GBG
Becomes super enticing tp £5
Posted in: REAT
EV/annualised EBITDA is 5-7 (dyo work, lads) Bit pricey relative to other plays, but the growth here is tempting tp 1.2
On tnw, div yield, comparison with peers etc etc obvs major shareholder selling down depresses sp temporarily
Posted in: CWR
Truly awful trackrecord is indeed key lol where's the visibility of sustained decent newsflow? let alone distant visibility on transition to fcf++? just burning cash and trading at high EV/rev isn't a great look
Posted in: HL..L
How does RH make enough to survive?
Excitable of course, you were saying the same at £7, £5, £3
Looks nailed on newsflow is needed for any meaningful reverse imv
I am sure that the wonderful JP Morgan has no agenda I see the shorters as my friends here If they culminate sub £6, that would sweet indeed (remember, as a rule of thumb...not scientifically demonstrated..shorts are much better at entry than exits)
Trade not showing plenty of tricks being played
Classic 2/3rds retrace from bottom would have been 227 ish...just sayin'
Create a free LSE account to:
Already have an account? Sign In
Don't have an account? Register for FREE